- From: Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:51:08 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-grddl-wg@w3.org, "Carroll, Jeremy John" <jeremy.carroll@hp.com>
On 08/02/2007 11:08, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > I thought a bit about the spec for this (the earlier e-mail in the > thread) and felt it could be improved. > It was a little unclear what I need to be looking for in the values. > > Suggestions: > 1) drop the "<" and ">" quoting the URIs; not used elsewhere in HTTP > Headers (I think) > 2) Use transformation as a token, rather than "transformation" a quoted > string, as the value of rel. > 3) provide grammar, extensibility, etc for these headers e.g. > My preference is to retain compatibility with the header as specified in RFC2068 and continued in draft-nottingham-http-link-header-00 Ian --
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:35:17 UTC