W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: FW: HTTP Header Use Case

From: Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:51:08 +0000
Message-ID: <45CB711C.4090702@talis.com>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-grddl-wg@w3.org, "Carroll, Jeremy John" <jeremy.carroll@hp.com>

On 08/02/2007 11:08, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> 
> I thought a bit about the spec for this (the earlier e-mail in the 
> thread) and felt it could be improved.
> It was a little unclear what I need to be looking for in the values.
> 
> Suggestions:
> 1) drop the "<" and ">" quoting the URIs; not used elsewhere in HTTP 
> Headers (I think)
> 2) Use transformation as a token, rather than "transformation" a quoted 
> string, as the value of rel.
> 3) provide grammar, extensibility, etc for these headers e.g.
> 
My preference is to retain compatibility with the header as specified in 
RFC2068 and continued in draft-nottingham-http-link-header-00

Ian
-- 
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:35:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:47 GMT