Re: FW: HTTP Header Use Case

On 08/02/2007 11:08, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> 
> I thought a bit about the spec for this (the earlier e-mail in the 
> thread) and felt it could be improved.
> It was a little unclear what I need to be looking for in the values.
> 
> Suggestions:
> 1) drop the "<" and ">" quoting the URIs; not used elsewhere in HTTP 
> Headers (I think)
> 2) Use transformation as a token, rather than "transformation" a quoted 
> string, as the value of rel.
> 3) provide grammar, extensibility, etc for these headers e.g.
> 
My preference is to retain compatibility with the header as specified in 
RFC2068 and continued in draft-nottingham-http-link-header-00

Ian
--