public-tracking@w3.org from January 2012 by date

Tuesday, 31 January 2012

Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Justin Brookman
RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Shane Wiley
Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) David Singer
Re: Exemptions and Exceptions.? David Singer
RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Shane Wiley
Re: Exemptions and Exceptions.? Roy T. Fielding
Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) John Simpson
Re: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are David Wainberg
Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Christopher Soghoian
RE: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) Shane Wiley
Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) David Singer
Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) Matthias Schunter
Re: tracking-ISSUE-120: Should the response header be mandatory (MUST) or recommended (SHOULD) [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Matthias Schunter
Re: ACTION-84: Wiley to describe the reason for setting DNT=null Matthias Schunter
tracking-ISSUE-121: Should a user agent advertise its DNT ability by, e.g., sending DNT;NULL [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call David Singer
Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) David Singer
RE: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are Shane Wiley
ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are Shane Wiley
ACTION-84: Wiley to describe the reason for setting DNT=null Shane Wiley
ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Shane Wiley
ACTION-52: Propose specific text for ISSUE-35, ISSUE-52, ISSUE-53, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58 Shane Wiley
ACTION-44: Also write additional examples around branding for first parties by next week Shane Wiley
ACTION-98: Bring input on ISSUE-111 to the group; otherwise it's closed Shane Wiley
RE: tracking-ISSUE-120: Should the response header be mandatory (MUST) or recommended (SHOULD) [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Shane Wiley
RE: ISSUE-43, ACTION-60: let the user know their options when arriving with Do Not Track Shane Wiley

Monday, 30 January 2012

RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Amy Colando (LCA)
Re: Exemptions and Exceptions...? David Singer
meta referer in HTML Karl Dubost
RE: Exemptions and Exceptions...? Amy Colando (LCA)
RE: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call Shane Wiley
Agenda for 2012-02-01 call Matthias Schunter
Re: Exemptions and Exceptions...? Rob van Eijk
Re: Exemptions and Exceptions...? Aleecia M. McDonald
tracking-ISSUE-120: Should the response header be mandatory (MUST) or recommended (SHOULD) [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Exemptions and Exceptions...? Jonathan Robert Mayer
Re: afternoon calls Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: Exemptions and Exceptions...? David Singer
Re: Exemptions and Exceptions...? Jeffrey Chester
RE: Exemptions and Exceptions...? Shane Wiley
Re: Exemptions and Exceptions...? John Simpson
Re: afternoon calls David Singer
afternoon calls Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: Exemptions and Exceptions.? David Singer
Re: Exemptions and Exceptions.? Jeffrey Chester
RE: Exemptions and Exceptions.? TOUBIANA, VINCENT (VINCENT)
Re: Exemptions and Exceptions…? Jonathan Robert Mayer
RE: Exemptions and Exceptions...? Shane Wiley
Re: Exemptions and Exceptions…? Rigo Wenning
Re: ISSUE-43, ACTION-60: let the user know their options when arriving with Do Not Track David Singer
Work on Tracking Selection Lists Karl Dubost
Re: ISSUE-43, ACTION-60: let the user know their options when arriving with Do Not Track Nicholas Doty
Re: ISSUE-43, ACTION-60: let the user know their options when arriving with Do Not Track David Singer
Re: ISSUE-33, ACTION-59: exemptions exposed to users David Singer
Exemptions and Exceptions…? David Singer
ISSUE-43, ACTION-60: let the user know their options when arriving with Do Not Track Nicholas Doty
ISSUE-33, ACTION-59: exemptions exposed to users Nicholas Doty
Re: Proposed Text for Issue 71 Nicholas Doty
Re: Proposed Text for Issue 71 Nicholas Doty
RE: Proposed Text for Issue 71 Shane Wiley

Sunday, 29 January 2012

Re: Proposed Text for Issue 71 Jonathan Mayer
[Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' David Singer
Re: Proposed Text for Issue 71 Jeffrey Chester
RE: Proposed Text for Issue 71 Amy Colando (LCA)
Re: Proposed Text for Issue 71 Jonathan Mayer
Re: Proposed Text for Issue 71 David Singer
RE: Proposed Text for Issue 71 JC Cannon

Friday, 27 January 2012

RE: Proposed Text for Issue 71 Amy Colando (LCA)
Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) Bryan Sullivan

Thursday, 26 January 2012

Re: Concerns raised today for header design Matthias Schunter
Re: Example of chairs decision as made in the HTML WG Karl Dubost
Re: Proposed Text for Issue 71 Frank.Wagner@telekom.de
Re: Defining Collection/Retention/Use/Sharing (ACTION-64, ISSUE-16) David Singer
Re: Non-HTTP Protocols (ISSUE-108, ACTION-96) David Singer
Re: Concerns raised today for header design David Singer
Re: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) David Singer
Proposed Text for Issue 71 Amy Colando (LCA)
Defaults by User Agents and Intermediaries (ISSUE-4, ISSUE-95) Jonathan Mayer
RE: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) Shane Wiley
Re: Slides - Remember to forget me Karl Dubost
Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) Jonathan Mayer
RE: Relevance of Current Law (ISSUE-98) Shane Wiley
Issue-14: (Re: technical, business, legal definitions) Rob van Eijk
RE: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) JC Cannon
Slides - Remember to forget me TOUBIANA, VINCENT (VINCENT)
RE: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) Shane Wiley
tracking-ISSUE-119: Specify "absolutely not tracking" [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) Jonathan Mayer
RE: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) Shane Wiley
Relevance of Current Law (ISSUE-98) Jonathan Mayer
Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) Jonathan Mayer
Re: Defining Collection/Retention/Use/Sharing (ACTION-64, ISSUE-16) Bryan Sullivan
Re: Action-40: Draft user defn language Bryan Sullivan
Issue-5: Do Not Collect Identifiable Data Ninja Marnau
The automated discovery discussion, slides as presented David Singer
RE: Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal JC Cannon
The automated discovery discussion, slides as presented David Singer
Re: Revised Response Header David Singer
Re: Example of chairs decision as made in the HTML WG Alan Chapell
Party Membership Assertion (ACTION-105) Jonathan Mayer
RE: Defining Collection/Retention/Use/Sharing (ACTION-64, ISSUE-16) Shane Wiley
RE: technical, business, legal definitions rob@blaeu.com
Re: Example of chairs decision as made in the HTML WG Roy T. Fielding
Non-HTTP Protocols (ISSUE-108, ACTION-96) Jonathan Mayer
RE: technical, business, legal definitions Shane Wiley
Example of chairs decision as made in the HTML WG Karl Dubost
Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) Roy T. Fielding
Re: Action-40: Draft user defn language Ninja Marnau
RE: technical, business, legal definitions rob@blaeu.com
RESTful DNT API approach to TPE Bryan Sullivan
Re: Revised Response Header Tom Lowenthal
Re: Concerns raised today for header design Ed Felten
RE: Defining Collection/Retention/Use/Sharing (ACTION-64, ISSUE-16) Amy Colando (LCA)
Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Joanne Furtsch
Re: Defining Collection/Retention/Use/Sharing (ACTION-64, ISSUE-16) Bryan Sullivan

Wednesday, 25 January 2012

Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) MeMe Rasmussen
Concerns raised today for header design Matthias Schunter
Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) Jonathan Mayer
RE: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) Kevin Smith
Re: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) Jonathan Mayer
Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) Jonathan Mayer
RE: Revised Response Header Kevin Smith
RE: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) Kevin Smith
Re: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) Sid Stamm
Re: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) Jonathan Mayer
RE: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) Shane Wiley
Re: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) Jonathan Mayer
RE: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) Shane Wiley
Re: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) Jonathan Mayer
Re: Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal Tom Lowenthal
RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Amy Colando (LCA)
RE: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) Shane Wiley
RE: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) Shane Wiley
Re: Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal Sean Harvey
RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Shane Wiley
Re: Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal Tom Lowenthal
Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Tom Lowenthal
Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Sean Harvey
RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Shane Wiley
RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Shane Wiley
Re: Defining Collection/Retention/Use/Sharing (ACTION-64, ISSUE-16) Jonathan Mayer
RE: technical, business, legal definitions Shane Wiley
Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Jonathan Mayer
RE: Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal Andy Zeigler
Re: Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal Tom Lowenthal
Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Jonathan Mayer
RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Shane Wiley
Re: technical, business, legal definitions Haakon Bratsberg
Re: Revised Response Header Tom Lowenthal
Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Tom Lowenthal
Updated Agenda for Thursday's Meeting Matthias Schunter
RE: technical, business, legal definitions Shane Wiley
technical, business, legal definitions Karl Dubost
Re: Revised Response Header David Singer
Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) David Singer
Re: Revised Response Header David Singer
action-97, application to other protocols, proposed text David Singer
Re: Defining Collection/Retention/Use/Sharing (ACTION-64, ISSUE-16) David Singer
Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) John Simpson
Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) Thomas Roessler
Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) Jonathan Mayer
Revised Response Header Tom Lowenthal
Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) Jonathan Mayer
Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) Roy T. Fielding
Issue-14: How do what we talk about with 1st/3rd party,relate to European law about data controller vs data processor? Rob van Eijk
Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Jonathan Mayer
DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) Jonathan Mayer
RE: Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal Andy Zeigler
Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal Andy Zeigler
Re: Public Commitment Requirement (ISSUE-45, ACTION-62) Jonathan Mayer
Defining Collection/Retention/Use/Sharing (ACTION-64, ISSUE-16) Jonathan Mayer
Re: Public Commitment Requirement (ISSUE-45, ACTION-62) Shane Wiley
Re: Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT Rob van Eijk
Re: Public Commitment Requirement (ISSUE-45, ACTION-62) Thomas Roessler
Public Commitment Requirement (ISSUE-45, ACTION-62) Jonathan Mayer

Tuesday, 24 January 2012

Re: AW: Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT Lauren Gelman

Monday, 23 January 2012

Missing the fun David Wainberg
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means David Wainberg
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means David Wainberg
Updated Agenda for Brussels F2F Matthias Schunter
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Bryan Sullivan
AW: Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT Frank.Wagner@telekom.de
Re: Article: Consumers ditch websites with poor privacy policies (PCPro UK) Jonathan Mayer
RE: cross-site tracking and what it means Kevin Smith

Sunday, 22 January 2012

Re: cross-site tracking and what it means - alternative formulations David Singer
Re: Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT Ninja Marnau
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means David Singer
RE: cross-site tracking and what it means - alternative formulations Kevin Smith
RE: cross-site tracking and what it means Kevin Smith
RE: Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT JC Cannon
Re: Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT Ninja Marnau
Re: Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT Frank.Wagner@telekom.de
Please read Community Group comments Aleecia M. McDonald

Saturday, 21 January 2012

Re: Article: Consumers ditch websites with poor privacy policies (PCPro UK) Lauren Gelman
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] David Singer
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Nicholas Doty
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means Jonathan Robert Mayer
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Nicholas Doty
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Nicholas Doty
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means Nicholas Doty
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means Jonathan Robert Mayer

Friday, 20 January 2012

Re: cross-site tracking and what it means David Wainberg
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means David Wainberg
tracking-ISSUE-118: Should requesting a user-agent-managed site-specific exception be asynchronous? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means Jonathan Mayer
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means David Wainberg
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means Jonathan Mayer
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means Jonathan Mayer
Re: What are the stable discussion documents for next week, please???? David Singer
Third-Party Definition Karl Dubost
Re: tracking-ISSUE-117: Terms: tracking v. cross-site tracking [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] Roy T. Fielding
Re: What are the stable discussion documents for next week, please???? Karl Dubost
What are the stable discussion documents for next week, please???? David Singer
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means - alternative formulations David Singer
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means Jonathan Mayer
Why we need a sound Do-Not–Track standard for privacy online Karl Dubost
Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft David Singer
Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft Rigo Wenning
Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft Rigo Wenning
Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? Rigo Wenning
test, ignore Thomas Roessler
Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? Karl Dubost
Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? Haakon Bratsberg
Re: Article: Consumers ditch websites with poor privacy policies (PCPro UK) Karl Dubost
Re: Article: Consumers ditch websites with poor privacy policies (PCPro UK) Jeffrey Chester
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means David Singer

Thursday, 19 January 2012

Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? Roy T. Fielding
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means Karl Dubost
Article: Consumers ditch websites with poor privacy policies (PCPro UK) Shane Wiley
Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft David Singer
Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft Sid Stamm
RE: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft JC Cannon
Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? David Singer
Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? Matthias Schunter
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means Rigo Wenning
Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? Karl Dubost
Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? Matthias Schunter
RE: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? Amy Colando (LCA)
Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? Vincent Toubiana
Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? Karl Dubost
Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft David Singer
RE: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? Shane Wiley
Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? Matthias Schunter
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means David Wainberg
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means David Wainberg
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means David Wainberg
Re: Dinner at Brussels on Jan 24 (Tuesday) [REGISTRATION REQUIRED] Matthias Schunter
Dinner at Brussels on Jan 24 (Tuesday) [REGISTRATION REQUIRED] Matthias Schunter
Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft Rigo Wenning
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means Rigo Wenning
RE: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft Kevin Smith
RE: cross-site tracking and what it means Shane Wiley
RE: cross-site tracking and what it means Kevin Smith
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means Sean Harvey
Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft Nicholas Doty
Re: cross-site tracking and what it means Jonathan Mayer
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] David Singer
RE: cross-site tracking and what it means Shane Wiley
cross-site tracking and what it means David Singer
Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft David Singer

Wednesday, 18 January 2012

Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Sean Harvey
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Rigo Wenning
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] John Simpson
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Sean Harvey

Tuesday, 17 January 2012

Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Rigo Wenning
RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Shane Wiley
response headers and caching etc. David Singer
RE: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Kevin Smith
Agenda for 2012-1-17 call Matthias Schunter
SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? Matthias Schunter
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] David Wainberg
Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Rigo Wenning
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Rigo Wenning
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Rigo Wenning
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Roy T. Fielding
Re: Agenda for 2012-1-10 call Nicholas Doty
RE: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Kevin Smith
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Jonathan Mayer
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Roy T. Fielding
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Jonathan Mayer
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Jonathan Mayer
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Roy T. Fielding
RE: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Shane Wiley
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Jonathan Mayer
RE: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Kevin Smith

Monday, 16 January 2012

RE: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Shane Wiley
Re: definition of (cross-site) tracking Aleecia M. McDonald
RE: definition of (cross-site) tracking Shane Wiley
RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Shane Wiley
RE: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Amy Colando (LCA)
Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] David Singer
Re: definition of (cross-site) tracking David Singer
Re: definition of (cross-site) tracking Matthias Schunter
Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Matthias Schunter
Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Matthias Schunter

Saturday, 14 January 2012

RE: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Ori Eisen - AdTruth

Sunday, 15 January 2012

Fwd: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Aleecia M. McDonald

Saturday, 14 January 2012

Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Roy T. Fielding
Re: definition of (cross-site) tracking David Singer
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Bjoern Hoehrmann

Friday, 13 January 2012

Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Tom Lowenthal
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] David Singer
RE: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Kevin Smith
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) David Wainberg
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD David Wainberg
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] John Simpson
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Tom Lowenthal
RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Kevin Smith
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD David Wainberg
Re: tracking-ISSUE-117: Terms: tracking v. cross-site tracking [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] Rigo Wenning
Re: tracking-ISSUE-117: Terms: tracking v. cross-site tracking [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] Rigo Wenning
Re: tracking-ISSUE-117: Terms: tracking v. cross-site tracking [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] Roy T. Fielding
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Rigo Wenning
Re: definition of (cross-site) tracking Roy T. Fielding
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Rigo Wenning
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Aleecia M. McDonald

Thursday, 12 January 2012

Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Bjoern Hoehrmann

Friday, 13 January 2012

tracking-ISSUE-117: Terms: tracking v. cross-site tracking [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 12 January 2012

Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD David Singer

Friday, 13 January 2012

Re: definition of (cross-site) tracking Roy T. Fielding

Thursday, 12 January 2012

Re: definition of (cross-site) tracking Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD John Simpson
Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Tom Lowenthal
meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] Roy T. Fielding
RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Shane Wiley
definition of (cross-site) tracking Roy T. Fielding
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Rigo Wenning
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Tom Lowenthal
RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Shane Wiley
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD David Wainberg
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Rigo Wenning
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD David Wainberg
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Bjoern Hoehrmann
RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Kevin Smith
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD John Simpson
RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Shane Wiley
RE: cross-site tracking (was diff of TPE editing since the FPWD) Shane Wiley
Re: cross-site tracking (was diff of TPE editing since the FPWD) Tom Lowenthal
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Tom Lowenthal
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Tom Lowenthal
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD David Wainberg
Re: cross-site tracking (was diff of TPE editing since the FPWD) David Wainberg
RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Shane Wiley
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Jeffrey Chester
RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Shane Wiley
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Ed Felten
RE: cross-site tracking (was diff of TPE editing since the FPWD) Shane Wiley
Re: cross-site tracking (was diff of TPE editing since the FPWD) David Singer
RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Shane Wiley
RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Kevin Smith
RE: Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT Amy Colando (LCA)

Wednesday, 11 January 2012

Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Jonathan Mayer
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Sean Harvey
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Jonathan Mayer
RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Chris Pedigo
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Rigo Wenning
RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Kevin Smith
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) John Simpson
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Jeffrey Chester
ISSUE-116: How can we build a JS DOM property which doesn't allow inline JS to receive mixed signals? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Roy T. Fielding
RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Chris Pedigo
RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Chris Pedigo
Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Rigo Wenning
f2f agenda Aleecia M. McDonald
diff of TPE editing since the FPWD Roy T. Fielding

Tuesday, 10 January 2012

Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... Jonathan Mayer
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Jonathan Mayer
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Justin Brookman
Agenda for 2012-1-10 call Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... David Singer
Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... Roy T. Fielding
Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... Haakon Bratsberg
Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... Rigo Wenning

Monday, 9 January 2012

Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... Haakon Bratsberg
Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... Jonathan Mayer
Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... Haakon Bratsberg
Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... Rigo Wenning
RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Shane Wiley

Saturday, 7 January 2012

Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Cedric Laurant

Sunday, 8 January 2012

Re: meeting locations & hotels rob@blaeu.com

Saturday, 7 January 2012

Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Jonathan Mayer
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Jonathan Mayer
Please register for the Brussels meeting Nicholas Doty
meeting locations & hotels Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft Nicholas Doty
Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft Sid Stamm

Friday, 6 January 2012

Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) John Simpson
RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Shane Wiley
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Jeffrey Chester
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Jeffrey Chester
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Justin Brookman
Re: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user? Rigo Wenning
Re: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user? Thomas Roessler
Re: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user? Rigo Wenning
Re: Issue-95: User Setting DNT Response (Draft) Rigo Wenning
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Rigo Wenning
Re: tracking-ISSUE-111: Different DNT values to signify existence of associated exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Rigo Wenning
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Jonathan Mayer
ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft Nicholas Doty
tracking-ISSUE-115: Should sites be able to manage site-specific tracking exceptions outside of the user-agent-managed system? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-114: Guidance or mitigation of fingerprinting risk for user-agent-managed site-specific tracking exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-113: Should there be a JavaScript API to prompt for a Web-wide exception? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-112: How are sub-domains handled for site-specific exceptions? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-111: Different DNT values to signify existence of associated exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-110: Is top-level-origin for outgoing requests workable for site-specific tracking exceptions? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-109: siteSpecificTrackingExceptions property has fingerprinting risks: is it necessary? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Amy Colando (LCA)
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Jonathan Mayer

Thursday, 5 January 2012

Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Jonathan Mayer
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Jonathan Mayer
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Heather West
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Justin Brookman

Wednesday, 4 January 2012

Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Jonathan Robert Mayer
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) David Singer
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) Jonathan Robert Mayer
Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) David Singer
RE: Unique sites Shane Wiley
Unique sites Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... David Singer
RE: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... Shane Wiley
Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... Jeffrey Chester
Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... Sean Harvey
Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... Jeffrey Chester
Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... Jonathan Mayer
RE: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... Shane Wiley
Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... Jeffrey Chester

Tuesday, 3 January 2012

Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party David Singer
Re: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user? David Singer
issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... David Singer
Re: Agenda for 2012-1-3 call Aleecia M. McDonald
Agenda for 2012-1-3 call Aleecia M. McDonald
Tomorrow's call will use Zakim as usual Matthias Schunter
Re: Zakim teleconference bridge is up Thomas Roessler
Re: Zakim teleconference bridge is up David Singer
Fwd: Zakim teleconference bridge is up Thomas Roessler
Changed Conference Bridge for Jan 04 DNT Call Matthias Schunter

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 January 2012 21:01:46 UTC