Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all...

On 10. jan. 2012, at 08:28, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org> wrote:

> On Monday 09 January 2012 22:47:21 Haakon Bratsberg wrote:
>> That said, I'm a bit skeptical about trying to align this work too much with
>> both US, Canadian and EU privacy laws. DNT must make sense in relating to
>> applicable laws = the DNT signal and compliance to it must in a meaningful
>> way address the raised privacy concerns while being based on how the web
>> actual works. 
> 
> Haakon, 
> 
> it isn't harmful if our work is aligned to regulation.

Agree (and apologize if it seemed that I had a different view)

> But here it is just 
> easy and without "alignment". I was merely pointing out a lucky coincidence 
> that will make life easier for companies who have to implement this anyway for 
> any outsourcing.

Agree

> And I think it plays well everywhere. So I just want to keep 
> David's wording as is and declare Issue 23 and 34 resolved with the 
> integration of that text.

Agree

> 
> Best, 
> 
> Rigo

Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2012 07:39:16 UTC