public-tracking@w3.org from January 2012 by author

Alan Chapell

• Re: Example of chairs decision as made in the HTML WG (Thursday, 26 January)

Aleecia M. McDonald

• Re: Exemptions and Exceptions...? (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: afternoon calls (Monday, 30 January)
• afternoon calls (Monday, 30 January)
• Please read Community Group comments (Sunday, 22 January)
• Re: definition of (cross-site) tracking (Monday, 16 January)
• Fwd: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Sunday, 15 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Saturday, 14 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Friday, 13 January)
• f2f agenda (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Agenda for 2012-1-10 call (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT (Tuesday, 10 January)
• meeting locations & hotels (Saturday, 7 January)
• Unique sites (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: Agenda for 2012-1-3 call (Tuesday, 3 January)
• Agenda for 2012-1-3 call (Tuesday, 3 January)

Amy Colando (LCA)

• RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Monday, 30 January)
• RE: Exemptions and Exceptions...? (Monday, 30 January)
• RE: Proposed Text for Issue 71 (Sunday, 29 January)
• RE: Proposed Text for Issue 71 (Friday, 27 January)
• Proposed Text for Issue 71 (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: Defining Collection/Retention/Use/Sharing (ACTION-64, ISSUE-16) (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (Thursday, 19 January)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Monday, 16 January)
• RE: Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT (Thursday, 12 January)
• RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Friday, 6 January)

Andy Zeigler

• RE: Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal (Wednesday, 25 January)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Saturday, 14 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: definition of (cross-site) tracking (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)

Bryan Sullivan

• Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: Defining Collection/Retention/Use/Sharing (ACTION-64, ISSUE-16) (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Action-40: Draft user defn language (Thursday, 26 January)
• RESTful DNT API approach to TPE (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Defining Collection/Retention/Use/Sharing (ACTION-64, ISSUE-16) (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Monday, 23 January)

Cedric Laurant

• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Saturday, 7 January)

Chris Pedigo

• RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Wednesday, 11 January)
• RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Wednesday, 11 January)
• RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Wednesday, 11 January)

Christopher Soghoian

• Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Tuesday, 31 January)

David Singer

• Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: Exemptions and Exceptions.? (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: Exemptions and Exceptions...? (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Exemptions and Exceptions...? (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: afternoon calls (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Exemptions and Exceptions.? (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: ISSUE-43, ACTION-60: let the user know their options when arriving with Do Not Track (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: ISSUE-43, ACTION-60: let the user know their options when arriving with Do Not Track (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: ISSUE-33, ACTION-59: exemptions exposed to users (Monday, 30 January)
• Exemptions and Exceptions…? (Monday, 30 January)
• [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' (Sunday, 29 January)
• Re: Proposed Text for Issue 71 (Sunday, 29 January)
• Re: Defining Collection/Retention/Use/Sharing (ACTION-64, ISSUE-16) (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Non-HTTP Protocols (ISSUE-108, ACTION-96) (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Concerns raised today for header design (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) (Thursday, 26 January)
• The automated discovery discussion, slides as presented (Thursday, 26 January)
• The automated discovery discussion, slides as presented (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Revised Response Header (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Revised Response Header (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Revised Response Header (Wednesday, 25 January)
• action-97, application to other protocols, proposed text (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Defining Collection/Retention/Use/Sharing (ACTION-64, ISSUE-16) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means - alternative formulations (Sunday, 22 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Sunday, 22 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Saturday, 21 January)
• Re: What are the stable discussion documents for next week, please???? (Friday, 20 January)
• What are the stable discussion documents for next week, please???? (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means - alternative formulations (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Thursday, 19 January)
• cross-site tracking and what it means (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft (Thursday, 19 January)
• response headers and caching etc. (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Monday, 16 January)
• Re: definition of (cross-site) tracking (Monday, 16 January)
• Re: definition of (cross-site) tracking (Saturday, 14 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking (was diff of TPE editing since the FPWD) (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (Tuesday, 3 January)
• Re: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user? (Tuesday, 3 January)
• issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Tuesday, 3 January)
• Re: Zakim teleconference bridge is up (Tuesday, 3 January)

David Wainberg

• Re: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Missing the fun (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking (was diff of TPE editing since the FPWD) (Thursday, 12 January)

Ed Felten

• Re: Concerns raised today for header design (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)

Frank.Wagner@telekom.de

• Re: Proposed Text for Issue 71 (Thursday, 26 January)
• AW: Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT (Sunday, 22 January)

Haakon Bratsberg

• Re: technical, business, legal definitions (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Monday, 9 January)

Heather West

• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Thursday, 5 January)

JC Cannon

• RE: Proposed Text for Issue 71 (Sunday, 29 January)
• RE: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT (Sunday, 22 January)
• RE: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft (Thursday, 19 January)

Jeffrey Chester

• Re: Exemptions and Exceptions...? (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Exemptions and Exceptions.? (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Proposed Text for Issue 71 (Sunday, 29 January)
• Re: Article: Consumers ditch websites with poor privacy policies (PCPro UK) (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Wednesday, 4 January)

Joanne Furtsch

• Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Thursday, 26 January)

John Simpson

• Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: Exemptions and Exceptions...? (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Friday, 6 January)

Jonathan Mayer

• Re: Proposed Text for Issue 71 (Sunday, 29 January)
• Re: Proposed Text for Issue 71 (Sunday, 29 January)
• Defaults by User Agents and Intermediaries (ISSUE-4, ISSUE-95) (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) (Thursday, 26 January)
• Relevance of Current Law (ISSUE-98) (Thursday, 26 January)
• Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) (Thursday, 26 January)
• Party Membership Assertion (ACTION-105) (Thursday, 26 January)
• Non-HTTP Protocols (ISSUE-108, ACTION-96) (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Defining Collection/Retention/Use/Sharing (ACTION-64, ISSUE-16) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Public Commitment Requirement (ISSUE-45, ACTION-62) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Defining Collection/Retention/Use/Sharing (ACTION-64, ISSUE-16) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Public Commitment Requirement (ISSUE-45, ACTION-62) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Article: Consumers ditch websites with poor privacy policies (PCPro UK) (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Saturday, 7 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Saturday, 7 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Wednesday, 4 January)

Jonathan Robert Mayer

• Re: Exemptions and Exceptions...? (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Exemptions and Exceptions…? (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Saturday, 21 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Saturday, 21 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Wednesday, 4 January)

Justin Brookman

• Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Thursday, 5 January)

Karl Dubost

• meta referer in HTML (Monday, 30 January)
• Work on Tracking Selection Lists (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Example of chairs decision as made in the HTML WG (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Slides - Remember to forget me (Thursday, 26 January)
• Example of chairs decision as made in the HTML WG (Thursday, 26 January)
• technical, business, legal definitions (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Third-Party Definition (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: What are the stable discussion documents for next week, please???? (Friday, 20 January)
• Why we need a sound Do-Not–Track standard for privacy online (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: Article: Consumers ditch websites with poor privacy policies (PCPro UK) (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (Thursday, 19 January)

Kevin Smith

• RE: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: Revised Response Header (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: cross-site tracking and what it means (Monday, 23 January)
• RE: cross-site tracking and what it means - alternative formulations (Sunday, 22 January)
• RE: cross-site tracking and what it means (Sunday, 22 January)
• RE: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft (Thursday, 19 January)
• RE: cross-site tracking and what it means (Thursday, 19 January)
• RE: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• RE: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• RE: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Friday, 13 January)
• RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Friday, 13 January)
• RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Wednesday, 11 January)

Lauren Gelman

• Re: AW: Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: Article: Consumers ditch websites with poor privacy policies (PCPro UK) (Saturday, 21 January)

Matthias Schunter

• Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-120: Should the response header be mandatory (MUST) or recommended (SHOULD) [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: ACTION-84: Wiley to describe the reason for setting DNT=null (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Concerns raised today for header design (Thursday, 26 January)
• Concerns raised today for header design (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Updated Agenda for Thursday's Meeting (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Updated Agenda for Brussels F2F (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Dinner at Brussels on Jan 24 (Tuesday) [REGISTRATION REQUIRED] (Thursday, 19 January)
• Dinner at Brussels on Jan 24 (Tuesday) [REGISTRATION REQUIRED] (Thursday, 19 January)
• Agenda for 2012-1-17 call (Tuesday, 17 January)
• SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: definition of (cross-site) tracking (Monday, 16 January)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Monday, 16 January)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Monday, 16 January)
• Tomorrow's call will use Zakim as usual (Tuesday, 3 January)
• Changed Conference Bridge for Jan 04 DNT Call (Tuesday, 3 January)

MeMe Rasmussen

• Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Wednesday, 25 January)

Nicholas Doty

• Re: ISSUE-43, ACTION-60: let the user know their options when arriving with Do Not Track (Monday, 30 January)
• ISSUE-43, ACTION-60: let the user know their options when arriving with Do Not Track (Monday, 30 January)
• ISSUE-33, ACTION-59: exemptions exposed to users (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Proposed Text for Issue 71 (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Proposed Text for Issue 71 (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Saturday, 21 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Saturday, 21 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Saturday, 21 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Saturday, 21 January)
• Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Agenda for 2012-1-10 call (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Please register for the Brussels meeting (Saturday, 7 January)
• Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft (Saturday, 7 January)
• ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft (Friday, 6 January)

Ninja Marnau

• Issue-5: Do Not Collect Identifiable Data (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Action-40: Draft user defn language (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT (Sunday, 22 January)
• Re: Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT (Sunday, 22 January)

Ori Eisen - AdTruth

• RE: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Saturday, 14 January)

Rigo Wenning

• Re: Exemptions and Exceptions…? (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-117: Terms: tracking v. cross-site tracking [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-117: Terms: tracking v. cross-site tracking [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user? (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user? (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: Issue-95: User Setting DNT Response (Draft) (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-111: Different DNT values to signify existence of associated exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Friday, 6 January)

Rob van Eijk

• Re: Exemptions and Exceptions...? (Monday, 30 January)
• Issue-14: (Re: technical, business, legal definitions) (Thursday, 26 January)
• Issue-14: How do what we talk about with 1st/3rd party,relate to European law about data controller vs data processor? (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Request for thoughts: US, EU, and international DNT (Wednesday, 25 January)

rob@blaeu.com

• RE: technical, business, legal definitions (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: technical, business, legal definitions (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: meeting locations & hotels (Sunday, 8 January)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: Exemptions and Exceptions.? (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: Example of chairs decision as made in the HTML WG (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-117: Terms: tracking v. cross-site tracking [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Saturday, 14 January)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-117: Terms: tracking v. cross-site tracking [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: definition of (cross-site) tracking (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: definition of (cross-site) tracking (Friday, 13 January)
• meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Thursday, 12 January)
• definition of (cross-site) tracking (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Wednesday, 11 January)
• diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Tuesday, 10 January)

Sean Harvey

• Re: Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking and what it means (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Wednesday, 4 January)

Shane Wiley

• RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Tuesday, 31 January)
• RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Tuesday, 31 January)
• RE: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) (Tuesday, 31 January)
• RE: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are (Tuesday, 31 January)
• ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are (Tuesday, 31 January)
• ACTION-84: Wiley to describe the reason for setting DNT=null (Tuesday, 31 January)
• ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track (Tuesday, 31 January)
• ACTION-52: Propose specific text for ISSUE-35, ISSUE-52, ISSUE-53, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58 (Tuesday, 31 January)
• ACTION-44: Also write additional examples around branding for first parties by next week (Tuesday, 31 January)
• ACTION-98: Bring input on ISSUE-111 to the group; otherwise it's closed (Tuesday, 31 January)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-120: Should the response header be mandatory (MUST) or recommended (SHOULD) [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Tuesday, 31 January)
• RE: ISSUE-43, ACTION-60: let the user know their options when arriving with Do Not Track (Tuesday, 31 January)
• RE: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (Monday, 30 January)
• RE: Exemptions and Exceptions...? (Monday, 30 January)
• RE: Exemptions and Exceptions...? (Monday, 30 January)
• RE: Proposed Text for Issue 71 (Monday, 30 January)
• RE: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: Relevance of Current Law (ISSUE-98) (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: Defining Collection/Retention/Use/Sharing (ACTION-64, ISSUE-16) (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: technical, business, legal definitions (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: technical, business, legal definitions (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: technical, business, legal definitions (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Public Commitment Requirement (ISSUE-45, ACTION-62) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Article: Consumers ditch websites with poor privacy policies (PCPro UK) (Thursday, 19 January)
• RE: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (Thursday, 19 January)
• RE: cross-site tracking and what it means (Thursday, 19 January)
• RE: cross-site tracking and what it means (Thursday, 19 January)
• RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Tuesday, 17 January)
• RE: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• RE: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Monday, 16 January)
• RE: definition of (cross-site) tracking (Monday, 16 January)
• RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Monday, 16 January)
• RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• RE: cross-site tracking (was diff of TPE editing since the FPWD) (Thursday, 12 January)
• RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• RE: cross-site tracking (was diff of TPE editing since the FPWD) (Thursday, 12 January)
• RE: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Monday, 9 January)
• RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (Friday, 6 January)
• RE: Unique sites (Wednesday, 4 January)
• RE: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Wednesday, 4 January)
• RE: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (Wednesday, 4 January)

Sid Stamm

• Re: Opt-back-in Information API (ACTION-94) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: ACTION-43: added user-agent-managed site-specific exception proposal to Editor's Draft (Saturday, 7 January)

Thomas Roessler

• Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Public Commitment Requirement (ISSUE-45, ACTION-62) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• test, ignore (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user? (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: Zakim teleconference bridge is up (Tuesday, 3 January)
• Fwd: Zakim teleconference bridge is up (Tuesday, 3 January)

Tom Lowenthal

• Re: Revised Response Header (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Revised Response Header (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Revised Response Header (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: meaning of DNT 1 and DNT 0 when sent by user agents [ISSUE-78] (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: cross-site tracking (was diff of TPE editing since the FPWD) (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (Thursday, 12 January)

TOUBIANA, VINCENT (VINCENT)

• RE: Exemptions and Exceptions.? (Monday, 30 January)
• Slides - Remember to forget me (Thursday, 26 January)

Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker

• tracking-ISSUE-121: Should a user agent advertise its DNT ability by, e.g., sending DNT;NULL [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Tuesday, 31 January)
• tracking-ISSUE-120: Should the response header be mandatory (MUST) or recommended (SHOULD) [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Monday, 30 January)
• tracking-ISSUE-119: Specify "absolutely not tracking" [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Thursday, 26 January)
• tracking-ISSUE-118: Should requesting a user-agent-managed site-specific exception be asynchronous? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Friday, 20 January)
• tracking-ISSUE-117: Terms: tracking v. cross-site tracking [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Friday, 13 January)
• ISSUE-116: How can we build a JS DOM property which doesn't allow inline JS to receive mixed signals? (Wednesday, 11 January)
• tracking-ISSUE-115: Should sites be able to manage site-specific tracking exceptions outside of the user-agent-managed system? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Friday, 6 January)
• tracking-ISSUE-114: Guidance or mitigation of fingerprinting risk for user-agent-managed site-specific tracking exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Friday, 6 January)
• tracking-ISSUE-113: Should there be a JavaScript API to prompt for a Web-wide exception? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Friday, 6 January)
• tracking-ISSUE-112: How are sub-domains handled for site-specific exceptions? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Friday, 6 January)
• tracking-ISSUE-111: Different DNT values to signify existence of associated exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Friday, 6 January)
• tracking-ISSUE-110: Is top-level-origin for outgoing requests workable for site-specific tracking exceptions? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Friday, 6 January)
• tracking-ISSUE-109: siteSpecificTrackingExceptions property has fingerprinting risks: is it necessary? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Friday, 6 January)

Vincent Toubiana

• Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (Thursday, 19 January)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 January 2012 21:01:46 UTC