W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > January 2012

ACTION-98: Bring input on ISSUE-111 to the group; otherwise it's closed

From: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:42:23 -0800
To: Tracking Protection Working Group WG <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <63294A1959410048A33AEE161379C8023D0C42585D@SP2-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com>
Should the user agent send a different DNT value to a first party site if there exist site-specific exceptions for that first party? (e.g. DNT:2 implies "I have Do Not Track enabled but grant permissions to some third parties while browsing this domain", DNT:3 implies "I grant you a web-wide tracking exception")

To better arm Publishers with the ability to distinguish between users who have a general DNT signal activated (DNT:1) and those who have also provided for a Site Specific Exception for their site, it would helpful for a different signal to be provided in the later case.  This approach will help reduce site-specific exception list queries, as well as, allow for a cleaner site-specific exception process on "first use" scenarios.

Where available, User Agents SHOULD provide 1st parties with a distinguishing signal to alert them that Site-Specific Exceptions exist for the 1st party.  If a User Agent supports this functionality, it must reply with a DNT:2 signal when appropriate.
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 04:43:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:38:31 UTC