Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1?

Le 19 janv. 2012 à 13:41, Matthias Schunter a écrit :
> It is not testable in any case. Without response, even a claim to follow is
> no longer visible.

huh? :)

A MUST conformance statement has to be testable. If you are saying that an implementer can NOT test the MUST, then the MUST is meaningless. Or I have misunderstood what you are trying to explain.

Karl Dubost -
Developer Relations, Opera Software

Received on Thursday, 19 January 2012 18:51:47 UTC