RE: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36)

I agree with Shane. Personalization based on demographics or organizational membership could also be permitted.

JC

-----Original Message-----
From: Shane Wiley [mailto:wileys@yahoo-inc.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 6:27 AM
To: Jonathan Mayer
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
Subject: RE: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36)

I disagree with a general prohibition on any personalization based on DNT which the current text would suggest.  For example, geo-location or context.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Mayer [mailto:jmayer@stanford.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 3:24 PM
To: Shane Wiley
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
Subject: Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36)

We haven't defined tracking in the document, and I see no reason to add a dependency here.

On Jan 26, 2012, at 3:21 PM, Shane Wiley wrote:

> Friendly amendment:
> 
> "This standard does not differentiate between personalization for advertisement targeting and other uses of personalization based on tracking."
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Mayer [mailto:jmayer@stanford.edu] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 3:13 PM
> To: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
> Subject: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36)
> 
> Proposed text:
> 
> "This standard does not differentiate between personalization for advertisement targeting and other uses of personalization."
> 
> And making this issue CLOSED.
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 14:45:14 UTC