W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > January 2012

Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36)

From: Bryan Sullivan <blsaws@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:29:23 -0800
To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>, JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>
CC: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CB4758B5.104B1%blsaws@gmail.com>
I agree, either a direct statement such as suggested or

"This standard does not single out any particular use of data for special
treatment under DNT, other than the cases of specific exemption."


But I like Shane's wording better.

On 1/26/12 6:59 AM, "Shane Wiley" <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

>Then I would suggest state just that then:
>
>"The standard does not single out behavioral advertising for special
>treatment."
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jonathan Mayer [mailto:jmayer@stanford.edu]
>Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 3:54 PM
>To: JC Cannon
>Cc: Shane Wiley; public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
>Subject: Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of
>personalization (ISSUE-36)
>
>This text is not intended to prohibit or allow anything.  It only
>clarifies that the standard does not single out behavioral advertising
>for any special treatment.
>
>On Jan 26, 2012, at 3:44 PM, JC Cannon wrote:
>
>> I agree with Shane. Personalization based on demographics or
>>organizational membership could also be permitted.
>> 
>> JC
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Shane Wiley [mailto:wileys@yahoo-inc.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 6:27 AM
>> To: Jonathan Mayer
>> Cc: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
>> Subject: RE: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms
>>of personalization (ISSUE-36)
>> 
>> I disagree with a general prohibition on any personalization based on
>>DNT which the current text would suggest.  For example, geo-location or
>>context.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jonathan Mayer [mailto:jmayer@stanford.edu]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 3:24 PM
>> To: Shane Wiley
>> Cc: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
>> Subject: Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms
>>of personalization (ISSUE-36)
>> 
>> We haven't defined tracking in the document, and I see no reason to add
>>a dependency here.
>> 
>> On Jan 26, 2012, at 3:21 PM, Shane Wiley wrote:
>> 
>>> Friendly amendment:
>>> 
>>> "This standard does not differentiate between personalization for
>>>advertisement targeting and other uses of personalization based on
>>>tracking."
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jonathan Mayer [mailto:jmayer@stanford.edu]
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 3:13 PM
>>> To: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
>>> Subject: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of
>>>personalization (ISSUE-36)
>>> 
>>> Proposed text:
>>> 
>>> "This standard does not differentiate between personalization for
>>>advertisement targeting and other uses of personalization."
>>> 
>>> And making this issue CLOSED.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>
Received on Friday, 27 January 2012 03:29:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:38:30 UTC