- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:28:33 +0100
- To: Haakon Bratsberg <haakon.bratsberg@opera.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>, public-tracking@w3.org, David Singer <singer@apple.com>
On Monday 09 January 2012 22:47:21 Haakon Bratsberg wrote: > That said, I'm a bit skeptical about trying to align this work too much with > both US, Canadian and EU privacy laws. DNT must make sense in relating to > applicable laws = the DNT signal and compliance to it must in a meaningful > way address the raised privacy concerns while being based on how the web > actual works. Haakon, it isn't harmful if our work is aligned to regulation. But here it is just easy and without "alignment". I was merely pointing out a lucky coincidence that will make life easier for companies who have to implement this anyway for any outsourcing. And I think it plays well everywhere. So I just want to keep David's wording as is and declare Issue 23 and 34 resolved with the integration of that text. Best, Rigo
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2012 07:29:04 UTC