- From: Haakon Bratsberg <haakon.bratsberg@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:12:31 +0100
- To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>, "rob@blaeu.com" <rob@blaeu.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
On 25. jan. 2012, at 18:53, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > Generally whether expected or not, we've come close to this same structure (to some degree) with the following terms: > > - 1st Party (Data Controller) > - Service Provider (Data Processor) > - 3rd Party (3rd Party) I do not expect Service Provider = Data Processor to be globally true. It depends on the legal relationship between 1st Part and Service Provider. Haakon > > - Shane > > -----Original Message----- > From: Karl Dubost [mailto:karld@opera.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 9:57 AM > To: rob@blaeu.com > Cc: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org) > Subject: technical, business, legal definitions > > This morning in Bruxelles, Roy proposed to use the definitions of European commission prose about > > * Processor > * Third Parties > * Controller > > Rob said that it was better to focus on technical definitions, than the legal, business ones of Europe. Currently, I have the feeling that our definitions are _not_ technical specifically in the compliance document. A technical definition of 1st party/3rd party in terms of the HTTP protocol will be very defined but it's not what we have done so far. > > > -- > Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ > Developer Relations, Opera Software > >
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 18:13:50 UTC