W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > January 2012

Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:46:01 +0100
To: Kevin Smith <kevsmith@adobe.com>
Cc: Jeffrey Chester <jeff@democraticmedia.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Message-ID: <10527756.GA5KK2TF7a@freud>

can you explain cross-site tracking by first parties to me? I just point out 
the logic break here. Either we talk about first vs third parties or we solely 
scope the entire exercise and scope to "cross-site tracking".


On Wednesday 11 January 2012 11:13:08 Kevin Smith wrote:
> Actually, at least in the early meetings, I believe we had near consensus
> that the objective of this working group would be focused around cross-site
> tracking (despite a somewhat confusing name of DNT).  Most of the current
> issues and discussions are reflective of this direction - such as defining
> affiliates, 1st vs 3rd parties, and exceptions to when cross-site tracking
> are permissible such as rate frequency capping.
> If that is still true, I think it's imperative to have it spelled out as Roy
> has done in the doc to avoid as much confusion as possible.
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 19:47:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:38:30 UTC