- From: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:26:57 -0800
- To: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
- CC: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
I disagree with a general prohibition on any personalization based on DNT which the current text would suggest. For example, geo-location or context. -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Mayer [mailto:jmayer@stanford.edu] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 3:24 PM To: Shane Wiley Cc: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org) Subject: Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) We haven't defined tracking in the document, and I see no reason to add a dependency here. On Jan 26, 2012, at 3:21 PM, Shane Wiley wrote: > Friendly amendment: > > "This standard does not differentiate between personalization for advertisement targeting and other uses of personalization based on tracking." > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Mayer [mailto:jmayer@stanford.edu] > Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 3:13 PM > To: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org) > Subject: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) > > Proposed text: > > "This standard does not differentiate between personalization for advertisement targeting and other uses of personalization." > > And making this issue CLOSED. > > >
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 14:28:11 UTC