wai-xtech@w3.org from September 2008 by author

Aaron M Leventhal

• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Social Accessibility now supports WAI-ARIA [Fw: post to WAI-XTECH - applying WAI-ARIA to existing web application] (Saturday, 13 September)
• RE: ARIA Test Matrix & ARIA BPG (was: Re: DHTML Test Cases) (Thursday, 11 September)
• Getting past Google captcha [was Re: Free-ARIA mailing list created] (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Free-ARIA mailing list created (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Monday, 8 September)
• [Control+F10?] was RE: What is the current situation with ARIA and accordion? (Monday, 8 September)
• Progressively enhanced tree that works [was RE: Tree sample code] (Monday, 8 September)
• RE: Tree sample code (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: [WebAIM] Using Google Chrome with a screen reader (Friday, 5 September)
• RE: What is the current situation with ARIA and accordion? (Friday, 5 September)
• RE: Windows Accessibility (Thursday, 4 September)
• RE: Windows Accessibility (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Tuesday, 2 September)

Al Gilman

• roadmapping checking for HTML+ARIA. [was: Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: [1.2T LC] should @role in SVG be animatable? (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: summary of backward compat discussion (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: summary of backward compat discussion (Monday, 22 September)
• function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Sunday, 14 September)
• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• Why the curly braces are not solving a real problem [was: Re: Mandatory and Important] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: WCAG2 comment 2615 (Wednesday, 10 September)
• WCAG2 comment 2615 (Wednesday, 10 September)
• FYI [participant handbook] getting from mail in your inbox to that same message in the W3C archive by Message-ID (Tuesday, 9 September)
• should WAI-ARIA 1.0 have a distinguished 'help' (or equivalent) role for how-to context help [ARIA 1.0] (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: What is the current situation with ARIA and accordion? (Thursday, 4 September)
• ISSUE-56 Re: Tree sample code (Tuesday, 2 September)

Arthur Barstow

• Request for Comments: Widgets 1.0 Requirements: Last Call WD #2; comments due October 13 (Friday, 19 September)

Becky Gibson

• [STYLE GUIDE] Window Splitter Comments (Tuesday, 23 September)
• [STYLE GUIDE] Grid example (Friday, 12 September)
• RE: What is the current situation with ARIA and accordion? (Friday, 5 September)

Ben Boyle

• Re: Is CHOICE a good solution? (was RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)

Ben Millard

• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)

Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)

Bruce Lawson

• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)

Chris Blouch

• IBMs splitter navigation keys (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Style Guide meeting summary (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Reminder: Style Guide meeting today (Tuesday, 2 September)

Christophe Strobbe

• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Wednesday, 10 September)

Cindy Sue Causey

• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)

Cynthia Shelly

• RE: summary of backward compat discussion (Monday, 22 September)
• RE: summary of backward compat discussion (Monday, 22 September)
• summary of backward compat discussion (Monday, 22 September)
• RE: Tree sample code (Saturday, 6 September)
• RE: Tree sample code (Friday, 5 September)

Dailey, David P.

• RE: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• RE: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)

Dave Singer

• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Friday, 12 September)
• RE: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Wednesday, 3 September)

David Bolter

• Re: Tree sample code (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Free-ARIA mailing list created (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions (Friday, 5 September)

David Dorward

• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)

David Poehlman

• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Getting past Google captcha [was Re: Free-ARIA mailing list created] (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Free-ARIA mailing list created (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Free-ARIA mailing list created (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Free-ARIA mailing list created (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: @longdesc - starting over (was RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Friday, 5 September)
• Google Chrome Accessibility: was: Re: [WebAIM] Using Google Chrome with a screen reader (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Windows Accessibility (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)

David Woolley

• Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Thursday, 4 September)

Earl Johnson

• Re: control flow in tab collections, for example when changing tabs (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Tuesday style guide meeting (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: What is the current situation with ARIA and accordion? (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: What is the current situation with ARIA and accordion? (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: What is the current situation with ARIA and accordion? (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Style Guide meeting summary (Tuesday, 2 September)

Eric Carlson

• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)

Evans, Donald

• accordion v. tabpanel keystroke convergence (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Hadi's Comments on Splitter (Tuesday, 30 September)
• DHTML Styleguide Meeting Tomorrow, Tuesday, September 30 at 12 noon Eastern. (Monday, 29 September)
• DHTML Style Guide Meeting Tomorrow September 23 at 12 noon Eastern (Monday, 22 September)
• DHTML Style Guide Meeting Tomorrow Sept 16 at 12 noon Eastern (Monday, 15 September)
• FW: Hadi's grid navigation model (draft) (Tuesday, 9 September)

Felix Sasaki

• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)

Geoffrey Sneddon

• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Wednesday, 24 September)

Gez Lemon

• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: dir=rtl and table header algorithm (was: Re: function and impacts) (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: contrived data table example (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: contrived data table example (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Friday, 5 September)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

• AT-SPI and IAccessible2 information (was Re: Using Google Chrome with a screen reader) (Wednesday, 3 September)

Harry Loots

• Re: SPAM(10.1) Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Windows Accessibility (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Wednesday, 3 September)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: contrived data table example (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)

James Craig

• Re: @headers Wiki page (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Progressively enhanced tree that works [was RE: Tree sample code] (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is CHOICE a good solution? (was RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• VoiceOver interaction docs (Was: ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions) (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: What is the current situation with ARIA and accordion? (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: What is the current situation with ARIA and accordion? (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Wednesday, 3 September)
• ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-56 Re: Tree sample code (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-56 Re: Tree sample code (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Tuesday, 2 September)

James Graham

• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)

Jan Richards

• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)

Janina Sajka

• Re: Getting past Google captcha [was Re: Free-ARIA mailing list created] (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Free-ARIA mailing list created (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Built-in Accessibility in GWT 1.5 Applications (Tuesday, 9 September)

Jason White

• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: Using Google Chrome with a screen reader (Wednesday, 3 September)

Jim Jewett

• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Thursday, 11 September)
• longdesc in the wild [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Tuesday, 9 September)
• acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Tuesday, 9 September)

John Foliot

• RE: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Friday, 12 September)
• RE: longdesc in the wild [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Thursday, 11 September)
• Regarding Transcriptions/Captions (was RE: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...]) (Wednesday, 10 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Wednesday, 10 September)
• RE: Is CHOICE a good solution? (was RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)) (Monday, 8 September)
• Minor clarrification : Is CHOICE a good solution? (was RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)) (Monday, 8 September)
• Is CHOICE a good solution? (was RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)) (Monday, 8 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Formal Request for Re-Instation of @longdesc into the HTML 5 specification (was RE: How to add/reinstate dropped accessibly features in HTML5 (was Re: longdesc="" in HTML5)) (Sunday, 7 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Saturday, 6 September)
• RE: @longdesc - starting over (was RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Saturday, 6 September)
• @longdesc - starting over (was RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Saturday, 6 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (Friday, 5 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 5 September)
• RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Let's let it go... (was RE: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google) (Wednesday, 3 September)
• RE: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Wednesday, 3 September)
• OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Tuesday, 2 September)

Jon Gunderson

• RE: Tree sample code (Friday, 19 September)
• RE: control flow in tab collections, for example when changing tabs (Monday, 15 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Friday, 12 September)
• RE: Tree sample code (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: WCAG2 comment 2615 (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Tree sample code (Monday, 8 September)
• RE: Tree sample code (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: ISSUE-56 Re: Tree sample code (Wednesday, 3 September)

Jonas Klink

• Re: [WebAIM] Using Google Chrome with a screen reader (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: SPAM(10.2) Google Chrome Accessibility: was: Re: [WebAIM] Using Google Chrome with a screen reader (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: [WebAIM] Using Google Chrome with a screen reader (Thursday, 4 September)

Jonathan Chetwynd

• regrets (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Wednesday, 3 September)

Joseph Scheuhammer

• Re: DHTML Styleguide Meeting Tomorrow, Tuesday, September 30 at 12 noon Eastern. (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: What is the current situation with ARIA and accordion? (Monday, 8 September)

Joshue O Connor

• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Using Google Chrome with a screen reader (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: [WebAIM] Using Google Chrome with a screen reader (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Using Google Chrome with a screen reader (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 2 September)

Julian Reschke

• Re: function and impacts (Wednesday, 24 September)

Justin James

• RE: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• RE: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• RE: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• RE: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• RE: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 5 September)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Multimedia Accessibility <Audio> <Video> Wiki Page (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: @longdesc - starting over (was RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)

Laura Carlson

• Re: @headers Wiki page (Tuesday, 30 September)
• @headers Wiki page (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: contrived data table example (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Request for PFWG WAI review of multimedia accessibility requirements <audio> <video> (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: Multimedia Accessibility <Audio> <Video> Wiki Page (Thursday, 11 September)
• Multimedia Accessibility <Audio> <Video> Wiki Page (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• How to add/reinstate dropped accessibly features in HTML5 (was Re: longdesc="" in HTML5) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Friday, 5 September)
• Fwd: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Friday, 5 September)
• Editor skills and funding (was: Looking for more editors and Editors) (Monday, 1 September)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Do we need axis or headers='a-TD-cell' ? (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Tuesday, 16 September)

Marc Silbey

• Moving details from the UA Implementers Guide to the ARIA draft (Monday, 8 September)

Matt Morgan-May

• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)

Michael A Squillace

• Re: AccProbe release v0.4.2 (Saturday, 27 September)
• AccProbe release v0.4.2 (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: Getting past Google captcha [was Re: Free-ARIA mailing list created] (Tuesday, 9 September)

Michael Cooper

• Mailing list for automatic diffs of PF updates (Tuesday, 9 September)

Michael(tm) Smith

• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)

oedipus

• ARIA Test Matrix & ARIA BPG (was: Re: DHTML Test Cases) (Wednesday, 10 September)

Philip TAYLOR

• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: @longdesc - starting over (was RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Saturday, 6 September)

Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)

• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)

Robert J Burns

• Accessibility for the Media Elements in HTML5[1][2] (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)

Ryan Jean

• RE: Windows Accessibility (Thursday, 4 September)
• RE: Windows Accessibility (Thursday, 4 September)
• RE: Windows Accessibility (Thursday, 4 September)
• RE: Windows Accessibility (Thursday, 4 September)
• Windows Accessibility (Thursday, 4 September)

Sailesh Panchang

• RE: summary of backward compat discussion (Monday, 22 September)

Schnabel, Stefan

• RE: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• RE: [STYLE GUIDE] Grid example (Monday, 15 September)
• RE: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• RE: Tree sample code (Thursday, 11 September)
• RE: ARIA Test Matrix & ARIA BPG (was: Re: DHTML Test Cases) (Thursday, 11 September)
• RE: Getting past Google captcha [was Re: Free-ARIA mailing list created] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• RE: ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions (Monday, 8 September)
• RE: ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions (Monday, 8 September)
• RE: ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions (Friday, 5 September)
• RE: ARIA BPG Issue: we should not be decreeing complex keyboard interactions (Thursday, 4 September)

Sean Hayes

• RE: Multimedia Accessibility <Audio> <Video> Wiki Page (Thursday, 11 September)

Shane McCarron

• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)

Simon Pieters

• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• dir=rtl and table header algorithm (was: Re: function and impacts) (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Tuesday, 2 September)

stephane.deschamps@orange-ftgroup.com

• RE: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 2 September)

Steven Faulkner

• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• re: contrived data table example (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: [WebAIM] Using Google Chrome with a screen reader (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: [WebAIM] Using Google Chrome with a screen reader (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: [WebAIM] Using Google Chrome with a screen reader (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 2 September)

T.V Raman

• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)
• Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)
• Built-in Accessibility in GWT 1.5 Applications (Tuesday, 9 September)

Tim Boland

• Re: Style Guide meeting summary (Tuesday, 2 September)

Victor Tsaran

• RE: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)
• RE: What is the current situation with ARIA and accordion? (Friday, 5 September)
• RE: What is the current situation with ARIA and accordion? (Thursday, 4 September)
• What is the current situation with ARIA and accordion? (Tuesday, 2 September)

William Loughborough

• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)

William R Williams

• USA & 508, Re: SPAM(10.1) Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google (Thursday, 4 September)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2008 23:58:30 UTC