- From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 23:36:13 +0200
- To: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, wai-xtech@w3.org
Jim Jewett 2008-09-09 21.34: > the question is whether it would be worth an explicit annotation. > > <details id=mov1><legend> > <a href=transcript.html>Annotated transcript of XYZ</a> > </legend> ... </details> > <video src=movie.ogg fallback=#mov1> > Please read the transcript or upgrade to a browser that supports > HTML5 video.</video> > > (For the moment, I am explicitly not taking a position on whether that > @fallback should be @alt, @longdesc, link@rel=alternate, etc.) > > I'm almost inclined to say "no", because the final <source> element > could do the same job, if properly defined. > > <video src=movie.ogg> > <source src=movie.ogv type="video/ogg"> > <source src=#mov1> > Please upgrade to a browser that supports HTML5 video.</video> > </video> > <p><a id=mov1 href=transcript.html>Annotated transcript</a></p> A very interesting way of solving the problem of a long/complex fallback for <video> and <audio>! Two flies in one bang: both the fallback issue and the "transcript available to all" issue solved at once. (Of course, it would be possible to say <source src=transcript.html> instead of <source src=#mov1>, if need be. But would/should both ways create the same user experience?) There is much similarity between this and using @longdesc . But this seems more logical - when first the opportunity is there. Lachlan, Henri - what do you say? ;-) -- leif halvard silli
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2008 21:37:01 UTC