- From: Harry Loots <harry.loots@ieee.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 21:47:33 +0100
- To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- CC: John Foliot <foliot@wats.ca>,wai-ig list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>,"wai-xtech@w3.org WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>,webaim-forum@list.webaim.org
> > When was Google elevated to status of beyond reproach? > I never said that they were, and I have reproached Google in the past. very well; if we agree that they're not beyond reproach then let's accept that off-topic or not, the criticism, tongue in cheek or otherwise, was accurate - and probably more than fair ;) Regards Harry ---------- Original Message ----------- From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> To: Harry Loots <harry.loots@ieee.org> Sent: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 13:00:13 -0700 Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC - Shame on Google > Harry Loots wrote: > > > When was Google elevated to status of beyond reproach? > > I never said that they were, and I have reproached Google in the past. > > > If it was Microsoft being criticised would you have defended them in > > the same > > manner? > > If the circumstances were the same, absolutely. I would [1] and I > have [2]. > > 1. Though I might do it from a different email account. ;-) > > 2. For example, web developers love to criticize Internet Explorer, > but they forget that at the time version 4 and 5 were released, IE > was leaps and bounds above the competition. I've defended Microsoft > on this point in the past, and while I prefer the current versions > of Safari, Firefox, and Opera to IE, it doesn't mean I think IE is > a terrible product that brings shame on Microsoft as a whole. ------- End of Original Message -------
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2008 20:48:13 UTC