- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@illinois.edu>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:35:00 -0500 (CDT)
- To: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>, Aaron M Leventhal <aleventh@us.ibm.com>, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Cc: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@exchange.microsoft.com>, George Young <gcyoung@microsoft.com>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>
This is fixed now. Jon ---- Original message ---- >Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:07:21 +0200 >From: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com> >Subject: RE: Tree sample code >To: "Jon Gunderson" <jongund@illinois.edu>, "Aaron M Leventhal" <aleventh@us.ibm.com>, "James Craig" <jcraig@apple.com> >Cc: "Cynthia Shelly" <cyns@exchange.microsoft.com>, "George Young" <gcyoung@microsoft.com>, "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org> > >I see no images in IE7. Feel free to design a "best viewed with" icon. >Alternatively, would be nice to give a sort string of info which browser to use/page was tested with somewhere on the example pages. > >- Stefan > >-----Original Message----- >From: wai-xtech-request@w3.org [mailto:wai-xtech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jon Gunderson >Sent: Mittwoch, 10. September 2008 19:10 >To: Aaron M Leventhal; James Craig >Cc: Cynthia Shelly; George Young; W3C WAI-XTECH >Subject: Re: Tree sample code > >Aaron, > >New tree example using links to create a simple action and role="presentation". The "expanded" and "contracted" images are used for backward compatibility with non-ARIA enabled browsers. > >http://test.cita.uiuc.edu/aria/tree/tree2.php > >Is this markup you were looking for? > >Jon > > >---- Original message ---- >>Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:14:42 +0200 >>From: Aaron M Leventhal <aleventh@us.ibm.com> >>Subject: Re: Tree sample code >>To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> >>Cc: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@exchange.microsoft.com>, George Young <gcyoung@microsoft.com>, Jon Gunderson <jongund@illinois.edu>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org> >> >> > That won't be needed, and won't be quite so >> confusing, once aria-label >> > is implemented. >> That would be adding redundant info. >> >> > Or, we could potentially change "nameFrom: >> subtree" so >> > that it does not include subtree nodes matching >> role="group"… >> I think this is close to right. How about the new >> name from subtree rule becomes this: >> Don't walk into subtrees for roles that doesn't have >> "Accessible Name: subtree". IOW we wouldn't walk >> into a grid or menu if it was inside the tree item >> either. >> >> To me this would be cleaner than having a special >> rule just for one role (group). >> >> - Aaron >Jon Gunderson, Ph.D. >Coordinator Information Technology Accessibility >Disability Resources and Educational Services > >Rehabilitation Education Center >Room 86 >1207 S. Oak Street >Champaign, Illinois 61821 > >Voice: (217) 244-5870 > >WWW: http://www.cita.uiuc.edu/ >WWW: https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/jongund/www/ > > Jon Gunderson, Ph.D. Coordinator Information Technology Accessibility Disability Resources and Educational Services Rehabilitation Education Center Room 86 1207 S. Oak Street Champaign, Illinois 61821 Voice: (217) 244-5870 WWW: http://www.cita.uiuc.edu/ WWW: https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/jongund/www/
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2008 18:36:42 UTC