- From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:44:17 +0200
- To: HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, HTML4All <list@html4all.org>
In HTML 4, in the context of the HTML 4 heading algorithm, axis="" and headers="a-TD-cell" are equal sizes: Both let a certain cell (either the one with the axis="" attribute or the one which headers="" points to) be incorporated into the @headers incorporpoating heading algorithm of HTML 4. Now, in HTML 5, if the purpose of @axis and headers="a-TD-cell" is *only* to label certain TD cells as header cells, *without* making them look like bold styled TH cells, then the purpose of both axis="" and headers="a-TD-cell" is purely stylistic. One would then be able to replace the following (Ex. 1): <td axis="The day of today" >23rd of Sepember</td> with the following (Ex. 2): <th style="font-weight:normal" >23rd of Sepember</th> and the following (Ex. 3): <td id=h1 >axis data</td> <td headers=h1 >data</td> with the following (Ex. 4): <th id=h1 style="font-weight:normal" >axis data</th> <td headers=h1 >data</td> But are axis="The day of today" and headers="a-TD-cell" only a stylistic thing? No. Not in HTML 4. As Ex. 1 shows, "The day of today" is CDATA. But does any AT software inform the user about the presence of an axis attribute? And does any AT software allow access to the content of the axis attribute? Can anyone help us with the answer to that? If the answers to both those questions are negative, then the next question is: Is it OK if it remains like that? If the answer to that is positive, then we - from an AT software point of view - do not need the axis attribute. We can ditch it. And we can as well ditch headers="a-TD-cell" as well, and use TH instead! So the call really goes out to the accessibility community: If we are the only stakeholders in axis="" and headers="a-TD-cell", and if AT software do not support axis="", and if we are satisfied with that situation, then we do not need to bother the HTML working group by any request that it should be possible to refer to TD cell with the headers attribute. Instead, let authors use <TH> and style them so they do not look like header cells. Finally: This is not what I want. I hope I now have demonstrated that HTML 5 needs both axis="" and the @headers incorporating heading algorithm of HTML 4. But **if I have described the situation correctly**, and if the rest of the accessibility community finds out that it is satisfied if only it can be permitted to let @headers point to a <TD> cell, then I am afraid that I have to back out. Such an approach would be futile. In other words: If the purpose of @headers, from the rest of the accessibility community's point of view, is only that authors and AT software shall be able to insert a headers attribute on each and every data cell in all <table>s that we want accessible (and this is the consequense of what the telcon decided regarding this, as I have described earlier today. [1]), then I don't feel that you are serious enough about this. We got to take the algorithmic side of this seriously - if, at all, it is important to be able to point with @headers to another <TD> cell. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Sep/0429.html -- leif halvard silli
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 19:44:59 UTC