RE: longdesc in the wild [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...]

Jim Jewett wrote:

>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Sep/0350.html)
> 
> Several people have said that the newest tools are the
> first that do support longdesc well, so it may be that we have ~1
> year of history and ~12 years of magic talismans -- with that study
> conducted during the magic talisman period.    

+1!!

JF

Received on Thursday, 11 September 2008 07:09:50 UTC