- From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 16:15:27 -0700
- To: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>
- Cc: wai-xtech@w3.org
Stefan Schnabel wrote: > Both Agreed. But what will you do if there is no keyboard standard > even > for the same control type on desktops? > Imagine 20 3d party WPF-based MS grid controls that work differently > here .. what to take as "standard"? Perhaps I don't understand your question. It's Microsoft's call as to how to standardize their controls like a WPF grid. I thought the point of WPF was that the control could look like anything, but the programming framework would understand its semantics. If that's the case, then the framework should hand those semantics off to MSAA. If a grid isn't accessible in a desktop app, how would its equivalent be made accessible on the web? > I do not think that a proprietary AT navigation for aria roles is a > blessing for the web. > The problem is that in the past this definition part has been left > totally to the AT vendors and you know the outcome. I'd disagree with you here. I am very thankful that VoiceOver's interaction model was not designed by a standards body. James
Received on Friday, 5 September 2008 23:16:08 UTC