RDF Syntaxes 2.0 Dave Beckett (Monday, 25 January)
Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0 Story Henry (Monday, 25 January)
Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0 Niklas Lindström (Tuesday, 26 January)
RDF to CSV vasavi kamdar (Sunday, 24 January)
CFP:NDT,ICBDE AND ICICCA Digital Information Research Foundation (Monday, 18 January)
call fro papers Lican Huang (Saturday, 16 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jeremy Carroll (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Danny Ayers (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jeremy Carroll (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes (Friday, 15 January)
- RE: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Michael Schneider (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes (Friday, 15 January)
- RE: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Michael Schneider (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Sampo Syreeni (Friday, 15 January)
- RE: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Michael Schneider (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Sandro Hawke (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes (Saturday, 16 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dave Reynolds (Saturday, 16 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Paul Gearon (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dave Reynolds (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Harry Halpin (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dave Reynolds (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Graham Klyne (Sunday, 17 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jeremy Carroll (Saturday, 16 January)
- RE: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Michael Schneider (Saturday, 16 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes (Sunday, 17 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jeremy Carroll (Sunday, 17 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Harry Halpin (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes (Saturday, 16 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Sampo Syreeni (Saturday, 16 January)
- Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Frank Manola (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dan Brickley (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Danny Ayers (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jeremy Carroll (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Dave Reynolds (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Danny Ayers (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Dan Brickley (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Paola Di Maio (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Damian Steer (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Graham Klyne (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Toby Inkster (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kjetil Kjernsmo (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Axel Polleres (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kjetil Kjernsmo (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Pat Hayes (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Harry Halpin (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Danny Ayers (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kjetil Kjernsmo (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Danny Ayers (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kjetil Kjernsmo (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Danny Ayers (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kjetil Kjernsmo (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Harry Halpin (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Datatyping (was: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: Datatyping (was: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") David Booth (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: Datatyping (was: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Sandro Hawke (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: Datatyping (was: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") David Booth (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: Datatyping Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: Datatyping Sandro Hawke (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: Datatyping Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: Datatyping Graham Klyne (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: Datatyping (was: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: Datatyping (was: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") David Booth (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Chris Dollin (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kjetil Kjernsmo (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Jiří Procházka (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Harry Halpin (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Richard Light (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Andrea Splendiani (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Lee Feigenbaum (Monday, 18 January)
AW: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Sauermann Leo (Tuesday, 19 January)
AW: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Sauermann Leo (Wednesday, 27 January)
Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement Rinke Hoekstra (Wednesday, 6 January)
Last message date: Sunday, 31 January 2010 15:37:23 UTC