- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:19:45 +0000
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 14 Jan 2010, at 14:53, Danny Ayers wrote: > 2010/1/14 Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>: > >>> * improved support for named graphs - essentially bringing the >>> constructs included in SPARQL back into RDF core (including support >>> for named graphs in RDF/XML, done in a manner that would be >>> backwards-compatible if at all possible) >> >> I'm not really sure how that fits all together. If you dereference >> some URI, >> and get back a RDF/XML document that includes other named graphs, >> what then? >> Surely the grph URI of the document you fetched you be the URI you >> dereferenced. > > That's certainly the elegant intuitive approach. Maybe I'm making the > mistake of engineering for engineering's sake, but I suspect there is > a role for multiple graphs in a single document/at a single > dereferenceable URI (dunno, somehow reflecting default graph/other > named graphs in SPARQL). Agreed, but not in the "default" syntax. > I don't have any genuine use cases. I do, backups (well, restores more importantly) of SPARQL stores. We use TriG syntax for that. - Steve
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 19:20:15 UTC