W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0"

From: Marco <marco.neumann@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:11:31 -0500
Message-Id: <3625A34C-85CC-411E-B63D-F4FF7450101F@gmail.com>
To: "Lynn, James (HP Software Professional Services)" <james.lynn@hp.com>
Cc: "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>

Hi Jim,

can you please elaborate a little on the first boat RDF missed?

Is this allegory only based on measuring wide adoption (eg use in RSS)  
or do you have other indicators in mind?

Marco

Sent from my mobile device

On Jan 13, 2010, at 7:53 PM, "Lynn, James (HP Software Professional  
Services)" <james.lynn@hp.com> wrote:

> In addition to what I am sure is a long list of issues already on  
> your table (Chris), I’d like to ask “what’s the goal?” What  
> role do people see RDF playing at this point even if all ills were c 
> ured? Would there be a place in RSS for RDF? How about annotating WS 
> DLs, WS-Policy, WS-*? I don’t mean to sound pessimistic but I do wor 
> ry that RDF may have missed the boat. When does the next boat leave?
>
>
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> James Lynn
>
>
>
> Consulting Manager
>
> Application Lifecycle Management
>
> Application Security • Quality Management • SOA Governance
>
>
>
> Software Professional Services
>
> Hewlett-Packard Company
>
>
>
> Tel : +1.484.239.7535
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 01:14:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:48:04 UTC