Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0


I would have thought that if we decide to have another RDF WG, turtle 
would be a candidate for an attempt on the W3C speed record from opening 
the WG to Rec .... e.g. month1 FPWD, month 2 LC, month 3 PR.

Basically, it is already spec-ed out, we already have many interop 
implementations, I suspect that the community has plenty of test cases.
Basically W3C should rubber stamp a de facto standard here, and the 
charter should make it clear that that is the intent (no meaningful 
review needed)


Received on Monday, 25 January 2010 17:13:06 UTC