Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0"

Steve Harris wrote:
>
>> * an RDF/XML profile (as above) designed for maximum compatibility
>> with XPath/XSLT/XQuery
>
> That would be nice. I often thing that RDF/XML is not a terribly good 
> way to encode RDF in XML.

TriX was meant to address that need. I do not believe its take up has 
been significant.
For several years now my view has been that RDF/XML is an obviously 
flawed system, with no compelling alternative.

Jeremy