Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0

On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 10:42 +0000, Steve Harris wrote: 
> On 25 Jan 2010, at 16:23, Dave Beckett wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > I was more thinking of allowing something like
> >
> > <s> <p> <o> <g> .
> That has the same issues. It's not the syntax, it's the maybe named  
> graphs, maybe not thing.

Can you shed some light on why this information -- whether the RDF may
contain named graphs -- needs to be determinable from the serialization

And does this mean that you'd like two formats: Turtle-NG, which could
carry named graphs, and plain Turtle (a subset of Turtle-NG), which

David Booth, Ph.D.
Cleveland Clinic (contractor)

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of Cleveland Clinic.

Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 14:59:02 UTC