Danny Ayers wrote: > I don't disagree, though the theory seems neater than containers, in > practice they do seem really clunky. Any thoughts on what might be a > better paradigm? Anything perhaps lightly layered on top of the > container style? > How about s p o? e.g. for a container with 3 things s p o1 s p o2 s p o3 i.e. the extra layer for the container is unnecessary and can just be omitted. I think the attractiveness of RDF is minimalism and quietly deprecating containers without any explicit replacement is quite doable. JeremyReceived on Friday, 15 January 2010 00:47:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:48:04 UTC