Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0"

2010/1/19 Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>:
> On Tuesday 19. January 2010 01:04:21 Danny Ayers wrote:
>> :foo u:kg "15" .
>> :bar u:lb "20" .
> [...]
>> surely easier?
>
> Yup, but it is on the other side of the complexity sweet spot.
>
> Consider a near-real-world example:
>
> :M62 a :Globular_Cluster;
>  :distancefromearth "22500"¤u:light_years ;
>  :diameter "100"¤u:light_years .
>
> :M15 a :Globular_Cluster
>  :distancefromearth "10.3"¤u:parsec ;
>  :diameter "30"¤u:parsec .
>
> if you have the same unit for different properties, it doesn't work, right?

Why not -

:M62 a :Globular_Cluster;
:distancefromearth [u:light_years "22500"];
:diameter [u:light_years "100"] .

etc?

Cheers,
Danny.

-- 
http://danny.ayers.name