What woudl be nice is to iron out the differences in the details e.g. of prefixed names between SPARQL, Turtle and N3. Then we have a set of basic terms for UIR, literal, prefixed name and bnodes on which to build various synatxes like TriG, N-quads+prefixes, Turtle, and also use such terms in non-RDF formats like TSV. Andy On 26/01/2010 15:07, Hugh Glaser wrote: > I am hoping that my proposal to make Turtle ',' syntax compatible with N3 > might find its way there for future consideration. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cwm-talk/2008JulSep/0002.html > It would be good if N3 documents were also Turtle documents. > Best > Hugh > > On 26/01/2010 01:49, "Dave Beckett"<dave@dajobe.org> wrote: >> > ... >> I've consolidated the issues I've got from my inbox, comments and elsewhere >> (IRC) into an issues list. That github repo also has the turtle spec >> history and tests. >> >> http://github.com/dajobe/turtle/blob/master/ISSUES.md >> >> (might improve the layout, I'm new to Markdown) >> >> and then I might make a new version there if I have the energy. It's >> more likely I'll do this before any new WG appears, I would guess. >> >> Dave >> > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 12:56:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:48:05 UTC