Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0

In message <4B5DC7CD.90206@dajobe.org>, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> 
writes
>>
>> They can: I have had a bash at writing a Turtle parser myself.  However,
>> I found issues with the spec itself, and with the way my target data and
>> Protege have interpreted it [1, last para].
>
>Well, that we (I) can fix.  I wasn't very happy with the way the spec
>syntax : triples mapping was written, but I hoped the test cases made
>things clear where words didn't.

The only issue with the spec itself was the point about allowing white 
space between tokens: that can be simply dealt with by a statement 
within the "white space" section, noting that the WS productions 
indicate where white space is required, but that it is allowed between 
tokens anywhere else. This was indeed clear from the examples.

Richard
-- 
Richard Light

Received on Monday, 25 January 2010 17:04:28 UTC