- From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:24:41 -0800
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
Sandro Hawke wrote: > I think the interesting and practical work here would be to specify and > demonstrate how to use Interpretation Properties in a way that is 100% > compatible with RDF as specified. I think that's the only way to move > forward with this kind of work. > I don't think 100% compatibility is enough. Adding a second mechanism will simply add to confusion. This was considered and rejected by the earlier group, even if that decision with hindsight was not brilliant (it was a 50/50 split). I preferred the other design, but I have to learn to live with the one we agreed. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 18:25:15 UTC