- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:01:33 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
2010/1/15 Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>: > Danny Ayers wrote: >> >> I don't disagree, though the theory seems neater than containers, in >> practice they do seem really clunky. Any thoughts on what might be a >> better paradigm? Anything perhaps lightly layered on top of the >> container style? >> > > How about s p o? > e.g. for a container with 3 things > > s p o1 > s p o2 > s p o3 > > i.e. the extra layer for the container is unnecessary and can just be > omitted. We have that container already? But how do we know the order? > I think the attractiveness of RDF is minimalism and quietly deprecating > containers without any explicit replacement is quite doable. Minimalism should be the touchstone, absolutely. pip, Danny.
Received on Friday, 15 January 2010 01:02:06 UTC