Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0"

On Tuesday 19. January 2010 01:04:21 Danny Ayers wrote:
> :foo u:kg "15" .
> :bar u:lb "20" .
[...]
> surely easier?

Yup, but it is on the other side of the complexity sweet spot.

Consider a near-real-world example:

:M62 a :Globular_Cluster;
  :distancefromearth "22500"¤u:light_years ;
  :diameter "100"¤u:light_years .

:M15 a :Globular_Cluster
  :distancefromearth "10.3"¤u:parsec ;
  :diameter "30"¤u:parsec .

if you have the same unit for different properties, it doesn't work, right?


Kjetil
-- 
Kjetil Kjernsmo
kjetil@kjernsmo.net
http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/

Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2010 22:29:01 UTC