Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement

Very helpfull replys from Pat it cleared up alot.

Except "Likes":

The relation "likes" on the set of all things can be equivalence relation,
because its reflexive (A likes A), symmetric (If A likes B, then B doesn't
have to like A), and is not transitive (if A likes B, and B likes C, it does
not necessarily mean A likes C)

    •       “likes” - ??? Any suggestions what it is ???

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Semantics-of-rdf%3AStatement-tp11705919p27026682.html
Sent from the w3.org - semantic-web mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 18:30:54 UTC