2010/1/15 Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>: > Steve Harris wrote: >> >>> * an RDF/XML profile (as above) designed for maximum compatibility >>> with XPath/XSLT/XQuery >> >> That would be nice. I often thing that RDF/XML is not a terribly good way >> to encode RDF in XML. > > TriX was meant to address that need. I do not believe its take up has been > significant. > For several years now my view has been that RDF/XML is an obviously flawed > system, with no compelling alternative. As an aside, do you think that if the W3C had (or would) put it's stamp on TriX, even just as a note with examples, it would (have) gained more uptake? There was the clunky 1998/99ish RDF/XML stuff which had eyeballs from xml-dev on it, but until relatively recently it seemed like the XML world and the RDF world were completely different planets. Now with the likes of Jeni & Bob DuCharme jumping on board the RDF raft it seems there is real crossover. (Not to mention the OpenLink one store, many views approach). Cheers, anny. -- http://danny.ayers.nameReceived on Friday, 15 January 2010 11:08:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:48:05 UTC