Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0

On 25 Jan 2010, at 06:38, Dave Beckett wrote:

> 
> So I'm happy with how Turtle turned out and that should be the focus of RDF
> syntax formats *for users*.  It does need an update and I'll probably work
> on that whether or not a new syntax is part of some future working group - I
> have a pile of fixes to go in.  Adding named graphs (TRIG) might be the next
> step for this if it was a standard.


I also like Turtle. 

And I think the next one to standardise - or at least just clean up, discuss, and publish some good specs - would be N3.

Henry