Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0")

On 19/01/2010 23:03, Paul Gearon wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Dave Reynolds
> <dave.e.reynolds@googlemail.com>  wrote:

>> A lot of the other issues may well be broken features but they are not a
>> problem.  I.e. they are not what stops people using RDF and when people do
>> use it they work with or around them without massive difficulty.
>
> My main reason for writing was to comment on this point. Collections
> do in fact stop me (and others) from effectively using RDF. Yes, I
> work with and around them, but they come with massive difficulty.

OK. I buy that.

[To be fair Pat's list of issues that I was commenting on said:
"(Not collections, ie lists, which are ugly but useful.)"]

Dave

Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 09:21:28 UTC