W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0")

From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:20:43 +0000
Message-ID: <4B56CAEB.9020107@gmail.com>
To: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
CC: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 19/01/2010 23:03, Paul Gearon wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Dave Reynolds
> <dave.e.reynolds@googlemail.com>  wrote:

>> A lot of the other issues may well be broken features but they are not a
>> problem.  I.e. they are not what stops people using RDF and when people do
>> use it they work with or around them without massive difficulty.
> My main reason for writing was to comment on this point. Collections
> do in fact stop me (and others) from effectively using RDF. Yes, I
> work with and around them, but they come with massive difficulty.

OK. I buy that.

[To be fair Pat's list of issues that I was commenting on said:
"(Not collections, ie lists, which are ugly but useful.)"]

Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 09:21:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:48:05 UTC