semantic-web@w3.org from January 2010 by date

Sunday, 31 January 2010

• Re: URNs vs. HTTP-URIs at CEUR-WS Hugh Glaser
• Re: URNs vs. HTTP-URIs at CEUR-WS Graham Klyne
• URNs vs. HTTP-URIs at CEUR-WS Michael Schneider

Friday, 29 January 2010

• CFP: 4th International Workshop on New Forms of Reasoning for the Semantic Web: Scalable & Dynamic ( NEFoRS2010) Zhisheng Huang

Saturday, 30 January 2010

• ANNOUNCEMENT: Raptor RDF Parser Library 1.4.21 Dave Beckett
• Re: Salmon Protocol for automatic RDF store augmentation? Danny Ayers
• Re: Salmon Protocol for automatic RDF store augmentation? Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Salmon Protocol for automatic RDF store augmentation? Danny Ayers

Friday, 29 January 2010

• Contd: ANN: Uberblic.org - Integrating the Web of Data Kingsley Idehen
• Ontologies for Business Applications zainab chuttur
• HPC 2010 -- Call for Papers Edward A\. Hirsch
• Re: ANN: Uberblic.org - Integrating the Web of Data Kingsley Idehen
• RE: ANN: Uberblic.org - Integrating the Web of Data Georgi Kobilarov
• Re: ANN: Uberblic.org - Integrating the Web of Data Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Salmon Protocol for automatic RDF store augmentation? Melvin Carvalho
• ANN: Uberblic.org - Integrating the Web of Data Georgi Kobilarov
• Salmon Protocol for automatic RDF store augmentation? Danny Ayers

Thursday, 28 January 2010

• Consuming Linked Data tutorial at WWW2010 Juan Sequeda
• CfP: Workshop on Transforming and Weaving OWL Ontologies in MDE/MDA (TWOMDE 2010) at TOOLS 2010 Fernando Silva Parreiras
• W3C Seeks Feedback on Early Draft of SPARQL 1.1 Property Paths; Six SPARQL Drafts Updated Axel Polleres
• Re: foaf:openid and validity Melvin Carvalho
• Re: foaf:openid and validity Matthias Quasthoff

Wednesday, 27 January 2010

• European Master in Computational Logic - many scholarships for all students Enrico Franconi
• Re: Turtle update (was Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0) Hugh Glaser
• Re: Turtle update (was Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0) Dave Beckett
• Re: Turtle update (was Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0) Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0 David Booth
• Re: RDF to CSV Mark Wallace
• Re: Turtle update (was Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0) Andy Seaborne
• AW: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Sauermann Leo

Monday, 25 January 2010

• Re: Turtle null prefix and namespaces Mark Wallace

Tuesday, 26 January 2010

• Mailing list for RDF and Perl hackers Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0 Niklas Lindström
• 2nd call of proposals Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries International Conference (QQML2010) Abstract/Paper secretariat@isast.org
• Call for Papers: The 11th International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE 2010) Stéphane Jean
• Re: Turtle update (was Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0) Hugh Glaser
• Call for Applications: 2nd International Summer School on Semantic Computing (July 2010, Berkeley, USA) Lejla
• Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0 Steve Harris
• Turtle update (was Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0) Dave Beckett

Monday, 25 January 2010

• Re: RDF, XML, XSLT: Grit Niklas Lindström
• Re: RDF, XML, XSLT: Grit Niklas Lindström
• RE: RDF Syntaxes 2.0 Michael Schneider
• Final CfP (Extended Deadline): 4th Int. Workshop on Modular Ontologies (WoMO 2010) Jie Bao
• Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0 Richard Light
• Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0 Dave Beckett
• 2nd CFP - 1st Workshop on the Multilingual Semantic Web @ WWW2010 Paul Buitelaar
• Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0 Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF to CSV Dave Beckett
• CompIMAGE 2010: Call for Short Communications João Manuel R. S. Tavares
• AW: [Ann] LESS - Content Syndication based on Linked Data Sauermann Leo
• Re: RDF to CSV Frederick Giasson
• Re: RDF to CSV Steve Harris
• Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0 Story Henry
• Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0 Richard Light
• Re: RDF to CSV Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF Syntaxes 2.0 Steve Harris
• Re: RDF to CSV Steve Harris
• RDF Syntaxes 2.0 Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF to CSV Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF to CSV Danny Ayers

Saturday, 23 January 2010

• [ANN] SPARQL Query Cache Jörg Unbehauen

Sunday, 24 January 2010

• RDF to CSV vasavi kamdar
• Re: foaf:openid and validity Dan Brickley
• Re: foaf:openid and validity Matthias Quasthoff
• Re: foaf:openid and validity Melvin Carvalho
• foaf:openid and validity Matthias Quasthoff
• Reminder: Monday Deadline on SemTech 2010 Call for Presentations Tony Shaw
• CFP: RULE 2010 (Edinburgh, UK, July 14, 2020) Hassan Ait-Kaci

Friday, 22 January 2010

• Semantic Web Meetup in Amsterdam, February 12th cgueret
• Last CfP: Commonsense and NMR for Ontologies Ivan José Varzinczak

Wednesday, 20 January 2010

• Call for Papers - 1. CriES Workshop (Cross-lingual Expert Search) at CLEF 2010 Philipp Sorg
• Re: RDF, XML, XSLT: Grit Frank Dengler

Thursday, 21 January 2010

• CFP Special Issue of the Journal of Web Semantics Mathieu D'Aquin
• Re: Datatyping Graham Klyne
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Graham Klyne
• Re: [Ann] LESS - Content Syndication based on Linked Data Sören Auer
• Re: [Ann] LESS - Content Syndication based on Linked Data Pierre-Antoine Champin

Wednesday, 20 January 2010

• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: AW: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: Datatyping Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: Datatyping Sandro Hawke
• Re: Datatyping Jeremy Carroll
• [Ann] LESS - Content Syndication based on Linked Data Sören Auer
• Re: Datatyping (was: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") David Booth
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Pat Hayes
• Re: Datatyping (was: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF, XML, XSLT: Grit Axel Polleres
• Re: Datatyping (was: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") David Booth
• Re: Datatyping (was: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Sandro Hawke
• Re: Datatyping (was: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") David Booth
• Re: RDF, XML, XSLT: Grit Christoph LANGE
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Jiří Procházka
• Re: RDF, XML, XSLT: Grit Axel Polleres
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Graham Klyne
• Datatyping (was: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Graham Klyne
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dave Reynolds
• Ordnance Survey - Forging links seminar John Goodwin
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dave Reynolds
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Toby Inkster
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Harry Halpin
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Harry Halpin
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Harry Halpin
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Harry Halpin

Tuesday, 19 January 2010

• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Paul Gearon
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Danny Ayers
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kjetil Kjernsmo
• AW: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Sauermann Leo
• Re: RDF, XML, XSLT: Grit Christoph LANGE
• Re: RDF, XML, XSLT: Grit Toby Inkster

Monday, 18 January 2010

• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Chris Dollin

Tuesday, 19 January 2010

• CfP: ICDEM 2010 Second International Conference on Data Engineering and Management Kannan Rajkumar
• CfP: Augmented Reality Workshop at WWW2010 Phil Archer
• Re: Turtle null prefix and namespaces Richard Light
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Diego Berrueta Muñoz
• Re: RDF, XML, XSLT: Grit Niklas Lindström
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Danny Ayers

Monday, 18 January 2010

• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Jiří Procházka
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Jiří Procházka
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Jiří Procházka
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: RDF, XML, XSLT: Grit Christoph LANGE
• CFP: EInternational Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW 2010) Philipp Cimiano
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Dan Brickley
• Mayo Clinic Informatics Summer/Fall 2010 Internship Jyotishman Pathak
• CFP: Workshop Proposals for EKAW 2010 Philipp Cimiano
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Turtle null prefix and namespaces Peter Ansell
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Damian Steer
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Ivan Herman
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Danny Ayers
• Deadline Extension: CIAO! 2010 workshop to be held in conjunction with the DESRIST conference Antonia Albani
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Harry Halpin
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Pat Hayes
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Pat Hayes
• Re: Semantic web formalisms (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kjetil Kjernsmo
• CFP:NDT,ICBDE AND ICICCA Digital Information Research Foundation
• CfP Web Semantics (WebS) 2010 Wolfram Wöß
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kendall Clark
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Harry Halpin
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Harry Halpin
• RE: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" andrea splendiani (RRes-Roth)
• Re: Turtle null prefix and namespaces Damian Steer
• Turtle null prefix and namespaces Richard Light
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Axel Polleres
• Re: RDF, XML, XSLT: Grit Reto Bachmann-Gmuer

Saturday, 16 January 2010

• call fro papers Lican Huang

Monday, 18 January 2010

• Final Call for Papers: NMR 2010 Tommie Meyer

Sunday, 17 January 2010

• RDF, XML, XSLT: Grit Niklas Lindström
• Special Session on Semantic Web and Ontologies John Edward
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Graham Klyne
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes

Saturday, 16 January 2010

• RE: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Michael Schneider
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dave Reynolds
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Dan Brickley
• Re: Semantic web formalisms (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dan Brickley
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Peter Ansell
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dan Brickley
• Re: Semantic web formalisms (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jiří Procházka
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Pat Hayes
• Re: Semantic web formalisms (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• new journal: "Semantic Web" by IOS Press Pascal Hitzler
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Sampo Syreeni
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Peter Ansell
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Peter Ansell

Friday, 15 January 2010

• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Sandro Hawke
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• Re: Semantic web formalisms (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Adrian Walker
• RE: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Michael Schneider
• Semantic web formalisms (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jiří Procházka
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Steve Harris
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Steve Harris
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Steve Harris
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Sampo Syreeni
• RE: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Michael Schneider
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Pat Hayes
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• RE: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Michael Schneider
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Paul Gearon
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Danny Ayers
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Danny Ayers
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Sampo Syreeni
• RE: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Sampo Syreeni
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Danny Ayers
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Danny Ayers
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Danny Ayers
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Danny Ayers
• RE: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Michael Schneider
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• RE: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Michael Schneider
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Pat Hayes
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jeremy Carroll
• RDF/XML (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kendall Clark
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Andrea Splendiani
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dan Brickley
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Sandro Hawke
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dave Reynolds
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dave Reynolds
• RE: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Michael Schneider
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Toby Inkster
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Richard Light
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dan Brickley
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Danny Ayers
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Danny Ayers
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Danny Ayers
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dave Reynolds
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Danny Ayers
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dan Brickley
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Danny Ayers

Thursday, 14 January 2010

• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Paul Trevithick

Friday, 15 January 2010

• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jiří Procházka
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jiří Procházka
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Giovanni Tummarello
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Pat Hayes
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Danny Ayers
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Danny Ayers
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 14 January 2010

• RE: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Georgi Kobilarov
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dave Reynolds
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Frank Manola
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
• RE: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Geoff Chappell
• RE: Ontology for semantic web technologies field [FW: CFP, Ontology Repositories and Editors for the Semantic Web] ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Pat Hayes
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Sampo Syreeni
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Steve Harris
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Steve Harris
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Dan Brickley
• Call for Workshop Proposals: The Fourth IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing mark.d.wood@kodak.com
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Danny Ayers
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Danny Ayers
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Danny Ayers
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Andy Seaborne
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Hammond, Tony
• Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Pat Hayes
• RE: Ontology for semantic web technologies field [FW: CFP, Ontology Repositories and Editors for the Semantic Web] Obrst, Leo J.
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Bernard Vatant
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Dan Brickley
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Danny Ayers
• RE: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Lynn, James (HP Software Professional Services)
• Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0") Danny Ayers
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Toby Inkster
• RE: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" George Shannon
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Graham Klyne
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Steve Harris
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Damian Steer
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Paola Di Maio
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Dan Brickley
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Chris Harding
• 2nd CFP: LDOW2010: 3rd International Workshop on Linked Data on the Web, at WWW2010, Raleigh, USA Tom Heath
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Danny Ayers
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Dan Brickley
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Dave Reynolds
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Jiří Procházka
• RE: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Lynn, James (HP Software Professional Services)
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Marco
• Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Lynn, James (HP Software Professional Services)

Wednesday, 13 January 2010

• Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Chris Welty
• 1st IRMLeS'09 CFP: 2st Int. Workshop on Inductive Reasoning and Machine Learning on the Semantic Web @ ESWC 2010 Claudia d'Amato
• Re: Ontology for semantic web technologies field Alexander Garcia Castro
• Re: Ontology for semantic web technologies field Jiří Procházka
• Re: Ontology for semantic web technologies field Aldo Gangemi
• Description Logics DL 2010 final call for papers David Toman
• Re: Ontology for semantic web technologies field Sean Bechhofer

Tuesday, 12 January 2010

• Canadian AI Graduate Symposium 2010 Ebrahim Bagheri

Wednesday, 13 January 2010

• Re: Ontology for semantic web technologies field Michael Hausenblas

Tuesday, 12 January 2010

• Final Call for Papers: Workshop on Matching and Meaning: Automated development, evolution and interpretation of ontologies. Michael Chan
• Re: Ontology for semantic web technologies field Marko Rodriguez
• Ontology for semantic web technologies field ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program
• Re: Last call for feedback before Drupal 7 alpha release ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program
• Call for Papers: i-Society 2010! info@icitst.org
• Re: Last call for feedback before Drupal 7 alpha release Stephane Corlosquet
• Re: Last call for feedback before Drupal 7 alpha release Manu Sporny
• Last call for feedback before Drupal 7 alpha release Stephane Corlosquet
• ESWC2010: Open calls - REMINDER (PhD Symposium deadline: 15th of January) Lejla
• CFP, Ontology Repositories and Editors for the Semantic Web Alexander Garcia Castro
• I-SEMANTICS 2010 - Call for Papers Tassilo Pellegrini

Monday, 11 January 2010

• CFP: The Multilingual Semantic Web Workshop (collocated with WWW2010) Philipp Cimiano
• FIS2010: Call for papers Lejla Ibralic-Halilovic

Sunday, 10 January 2010

• Semantic Web Help aianta

Thursday, 7 January 2010

• ESWC 2010 CfP: Workshop on Adaptation, Personalization and REcommendation in the Social-semantic Web (APRESW 2010) Iván Cantador

Friday, 8 January 2010

• CFP - 2nd International Workshop on Trust and Privacy on the Social and Semantic Web (SPOT 2010) Alexandre Passant
• CFP: The Future of the Web for Collaborative Science (FWCS 2010) at WWW'10 Jun Zhao
• WebSci 2010 Call for Abstracts Guus Schreiber

Thursday, 7 January 2010

• Call for Workshop Proposals - UIC 2010, October 26-29, Xi\'an, China Robert C. Hsu
• Call for Papers: 2nd International Workshop on Advanced Enterprise Architecture and Repositories (AER 2010) Ulrich Reimer
• ESWC 2010: Call for System Demonstrations valentina presutti
• ESWC 2010: Call for Posters valentina presutti
• Call for Papers: i-Society 2010! i-Society 2010

Wednesday, 6 January 2010

• Call for Papers - IET FC 2010, August 4-6, 2010, Taichung, Taiwan Robert C. Hsu
• Deadline Extension to January 15, 2010 - Workshop on Matching and Meaning: Automated development, evolution and interpretation of ontologies. Michael Chan
• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement Dan Brickley
• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement Toby Inkster

Tuesday, 5 January 2010

• Call for Papers: 5th Workshop on Semantic Wikis (SemWiki2010) Jochen Reutelshoefer

Wednesday, 6 January 2010

• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement Rinke Hoekstra

Tuesday, 5 January 2010

• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement Pat Hayes
• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement Pat Hayes
• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement darood
• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement darood
• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement darood
• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement darood
• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement darood
• IEEE Internet Computing - Special Issue on Overcoming Information Overload Issues Francesco Guerra
• Call for Papers - ICA3PP 2010, May 21-23, Busan, Korea Robert C. Hsu
• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement Dan Brickley
• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement Melvin Carvalho
• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement Pat Hayes
• 2nd CFP - 4th Int. Workshop on Modular Ontologies (WoMO) - Submission deadline: Jan 29, 2010 Jie Bao

Monday, 4 January 2010

• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement darood
• Re: Explicit RDF property for "literal has datatype D"? Jiří Procházka
• Re: Explicit RDF property for "literal has datatype D"? Pat Hayes
• Re: Explicit RDF property for "literal has datatype D"? Jiří Procházka
• Re: Explicit RDF property for "literal has datatype D"? Pat Hayes
• Question regarding demand for ontological learning tools George Shannon
• Re: Explicit RDF property for "literal has datatype D"? Jiří Procházka
• CFP: Semantics of Visual Objects @ WWW 2010 Leo Ferres
• CFP: RULE 2010 (Edinburgh, UK, July 14, 2010) Hassan Ait-Kaci
• ESWC 2010 Tutorial Proposals Deadline is today valentina presutti
• PhD position in Knowledge & Data Engineering Group, University of Kassel Gerd Stumme
• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement Dan Brickley
• Re: Explicit RDF property for "literal has datatype D"? Dave Reynolds
• Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement darood
• Re: Explicit RDF property for "literal has datatype D"? Jiří Procházka

Saturday, 2 January 2010

• EC-Web 2010 - 1st Cfp Giovanni Semeraro
• EC-Web 2010 - 1st Cfp Giovanni Semeraro

Last message date: Sunday, 31 January 2010 15:37:23 UTC