W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0")

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:26:15 +0100
Message-ID: <1f2ed5cd1001150926l4c4fd817s5505e10b57f76d52@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
2010/1/15 Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>:

> Ok, so this sounds to me just like vanilla deprecation, I don't see anything
> going on "quietly" here.
>
> I just asked, because I remembered having seen this term "quiet deprecation"
> more than once being used in this thread, and I wondered whether there is
> something important that I have missed.

The "quiet" bit, as far as I'd put it, would be for there to be no
formal statement of deprecation, simply that the person using the spec
wouldn't find the feature unless they digged deep - after they'd found
a better solution.
Received on Friday, 15 January 2010 17:26:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:48:05 UTC