W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0"

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:57:15 +0100
Message-ID: <1f2ed5cd1001150257u77467f33m201dda3ffcfc317d@mail.gmail.com>
To: jeremy@topquadrant.com, tai@g5n.co.uk
Cc: "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Jeremy, Toby, anyone,

Aside from a little  tidiness, what would we actually gain through
going the whole hog on what can go in which position in the triple?

blank node predicate - what does that tell you that an rdfs:seeAlso wouldn't?

literal subject - aside from quotations:

"I can't really see how it would be useful" <x:saidBy> <#me> .

Received on Friday, 15 January 2010 10:57:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:48:05 UTC