- From: Sauermann Leo <leo.sauermann@gnowsis.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:38:51 +0100
- To: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Without having the time to read through the MASSIVE amount of replies: I would love to simplify RDF/XML and have been documenting that for years here: http://esw.w3.org/topic/SimpleRdfXml best Leo -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: semantic-web-request@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Chris Welty Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2010 17:00 An: semantic-web@w3.org Betreff: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0" Without volunteering myself to be such a contact, I have (as both a users of many RDF implementations and a W3C chair and I suppose a self-declared semantic web expert) been the recipient of a lot of complaints and suggestions regarding the design and implementation of RDF, and at ISWC a few months ago I suggested to Ivan that we start discussing starting a working group that would investigate a next version of RDF. This discussion is happening in several places already, and we thought this was the best place to house that discussion for now. A workshop on this subject is also in the planning, more news on that in a week or two. I suppose we don't really need to discuss whether we should investigate an "RDF 2.0", but rather what kinds of requirements various RDF users have that they would like to be considered (I'd like this thread to be less "+1" and "-1" messages, and more "I'd like to see RDF support x...") -Chris -- Dr. Christopher A. Welty IBM Watson Research Center +1.914.784.7055 19 Skyline Dr. cawelty@gmail.com Hawthorne, NY 10532 http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2010 22:03:43 UTC