- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:44:39 +0100
- To: Matthias Quasthoff <matthias--web@quasthoffs.de>
- Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Matthias Quasthoff <matthias--web@quasthoffs.de> wrote: > Melvin Carvalho schrieb: >> >> Your Web ID should be a foaf:Person >> >> http://esw.w3.org/topic/WebID >> >> and your openid should be a URI > > According to FOAF my openid should be a foaf:Document, and that's my > problem. > > My Web ID is <http://quasthoffs.de/matthias>. From the semantics of OpenID I > do not see why <http://quasthoffs.de/matthias> should not be my OpenID. IMHO > any resource should qualify to be my OpenID. Yes, this is a case not supported by having foaf:openid's range be foaf:Document. I'm willing to relax this if the consensus of the OpenID community is that OpenID URIs (can? always?) directly identify people, rather than their personas/accounts. Also note that claim that the class foaf:Person is disjoint with class foaf:Document doesn't fit with treating tattood people as documents. I don't think the sky would fall in if we made in non-nonsensical to assert that something was simultaneously a person and a document. However I don't look forward to explaining it in the documentation... Dan
Received on Sunday, 24 January 2010 20:45:10 UTC