W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0")

From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:04:02 -0800
Message-ID: <4B566492.4050608@topquadrant.com>
To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
CC: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>

Michael Schneider wrote:
> In /my/ experience, you will find for virtually every RDF feature some gang
> of people claiming that the feature is not helpful or even broken.

In desperation, ... rdf:Alt ? :)


Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 02:05:28 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Harry Halpin: "Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0")"
Previous message: Harry Halpin: "Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0""
In reply to: Michael Schneider: "RE: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0")"
Next in thread: Harry Halpin: "Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0")"
Reply: Harry Halpin: "Re: Alternatives to containers/collections (was Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0")"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:48:05 UTC