Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0"

On 18 Jan 2010, at 18:10, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

> + Specify the semantics of named graphs.

Is there much to do there? Pat et al seemed to have covered it (although HP Labs have broken the link :-(

<http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/>
<http://www2005.org/cdrom/docs/p613.pdf>

Named graph semantics is a tiny addition to rdf semantics.

Damian

Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 19:55:23 UTC