W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0"

From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:47:16 -0800
Message-ID: <4B5660A4.1010604@topquadrant.com>
To: Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com>
CC: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Damian Steer wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2010, at 18:10, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>
>   
>> + Specify the semantics of named graphs.
>>     
>
> Is there much to do there? Pat et al seemed to have covered it (although HP Labs have broken the link :-(
>
> <http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/>
> <http://www2005.org/cdrom/docs/p613.pdf>
>
> Named graph semantics is a tiny addition to rdf semantics.
>
> Damian
>
>   

That document, which deliberately says very little, could be the basis 
of a short recommendation on (lack of) NG formal semantics

Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 01:48:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:48:05 UTC