Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0"

Damian Steer wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2010, at 18:10, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> 
>> + Specify the semantics of named graphs.
> 
> Is there much to do there? 

As I said, I have no idea. :)

> Pat et al seemed to have covered it (although HP Labs have broken the link :-(
> 
> <http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/>
> <http://www2005.org/cdrom/docs/p613.pdf>
> 
> Named graph semantics is a tiny addition to rdf semantics.

Even better.

Lee

> 
> Damian
> 

Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 21:00:30 UTC