W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Requirements for a possible "RDF 2.0"

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:01:41 +0100
Message-ID: <eb19f3361001181401vb1ba8aej1eeeae1b7aebeed5@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, semantic-web@w3.org
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net> wrote:
> On Monday 18. January 2010 17:59:26 Pat Hayes wrote:
>> But how else would you naturally express a property of anything in
>> RDF, than by writing a triple? It sounds like you want to not be using
>> RDF at all :-)
> Oh, yes, I do! We already have precedent: datatypes and languages are
> "properties" of literals, and I think units should be done in much the same
> way, unless we find a way to do it in a more general way, that is also
> simple enough in practice.

How far can we go by overloading the existing datatyping mechanism?
ie. decorate literals with URIs that stand for particular encodings of
particular units?

Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 22:02:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:48:05 UTC