Re: Semantics of rdf:Statement

Very helpfull replys from Pat it cleared up alot.

Except "Likes":

The relation "likes" on the set of all things can be equivalence relation,
because its reflexive (A likes A), symmetric (If A likes B, then B doesn't
have to like A), and is not transitive (if A likes B, and B likes C, it does
not necessarily mean A likes C)

    •       “likes” - ??? Any suggestions what it is ???

View this message in context:
Sent from the - semantic-web mailing list archive at

Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 18:31:33 UTC