- From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:43:30 -0800
- To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- CC: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Michael Schneider wrote: > Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > >> I think the attractiveness of RDF is minimalism and quietly deprecating >> containers without any explicit replacement is quite doable. >> > > What would "quietly deprecating" mean? > The bits of RDF I don't like :) could be marked as deprecated. The documentation of RDF would discourage their use in new ontologies and schemas, but existing systems would continue to use them. i.e. we would have explicit agreement in the community that there are better ways to achieve the same effects, but pragmatically a realization that would is done, is done. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 15 January 2010 16:44:23 UTC