Re: [Reminder] UFDTF TC @ Mon Mar 31 10am - 11am ()
comment on primer: RDF/XML encoding of property lists....
Another mini comment on the RDF/XML examples in the Primer
some syntax errors in the RDF/XML example
Thanks to primer reviewers
fragments comments
I have just implemented the resolution of ISSUE-12
Some comments on the Primer document
ISSUE-107 (deprecate Lite): RAISED: Deprecate OWL Lite
ISSUE-106 (namespace): RAISED: reuse OWL 1.0 namespace? owl11 poor prefix choice
- Re: ISSUE-106 (namespace): RAISED: reuse OWL 1.0 namespace? owl11 poor prefix choice
- Re: ISSUE-106 (namespace): RAISED: reuse OWL 1.0 namespace? owl11 poor prefix choice
- Re: ISSUE-106 (namespace): RAISED: reuse OWL 1.0 namespace? owl11 poor prefix choice
I've just added a note for DL-lite, as requested by my ACTION-116
comment on fragments
Fwd: Nonstructural restrictions
Re: Data property axioms in EL++ [ was Re: Review of Fragments Doc for ACTION-110 ]
Draft minutes from today's OWL WG teleconference
Negative object/data property assertions in EL++
- Re: Negative object/data property assertions in EL++
- Re: Negative object/data property assertions in EL++
abstracts
Fwd: Interruption to W3C Teleconference System
Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations)
Fwd: Interruption to W3C Teleconference System
Agenda for Teleconf 26th March 2008
ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics
xml namespace and schema-location for OWL 1.1 XML Syntax
in-line review comments
Proposal to resolve ISSUE-67
Review of Primer Doc
ISSUE-105 (meta/data): Meta Issue to track other issues related to datatypes
Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81
Changes to annotation properties (addressing ACTION-113)
Monday imports TF meeting cancelled
Agenda for Washington F2F
ISSUE-104 (disallowed vocabulary): OWL 1.1 DL does not have a disallowed vocabulary
naming OWL-R :-)
XML Serialization
responses to reviews for XML syntax
OWL Primer review
ACTION-102: The situation of deprecation in OWL-1.0-DL and OWL-1.0-Full
Proposal to close ISSUE-12
F2F2 registration
F2F2 status
ACTION-106: Detailed review of the Fragments Proposal and XML serialization documents
Agenda for teleconference Wednesday March 19, 2008
fragments question re DL-Lite
Review of Fragments Doc for ACTION-110
Proposal to close ISSUE-78: OWL-Lite as EL++
Raw minutes from UFDTF meeting 208-03-17
Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86
ISSUE-103 (metamapping): Meta Issue to track other issues related to mapping
status of ISSUE-79 ?
Proposal to close ISSUE-75: OWL-Lite as EL++
Proposal to close Issue-75
Re: ISSUE-15: Ontologies should not be required to include a URI
unionOf vs. disjointUnionOf in the RDF mapping
User Facing Document Task Force Meeting Monday March 17, 2008 10AM EST
Imports Task Force Meeting Monday March 17, 2008 10AM EST
Oops and review comments
RDF-to-Functional mapping: What happens if an RDF graph contains un-mappable portions?
Question about annotation of and to axioms
F2F Agenda
proposal to close ISSUE-102
OWL WG F2F sign-up
Agenda
Action-97 Proposal for User-facing documentation: OWL Cookbook
Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility
Agenda for TC Wed 2008-03-12
ISSUE-102 (AnnotationProperty): URI cannot be declared to be an annotation property, which in turn means that annotation URIs can't have annotations on them
ISSUE-101 (plainliterals): equating plain literals with no language tag to xsd:string
- Re: ISSUE-101 (plainliterals): RAISED - No Discussion
- RE: ISSUE-101 (plainliterals): equating plain literals with no language tag to xsd:string
ACTION-93 (Full semantics): Short report about current state
- Re: ACTION-93 (Full semantics): Short report about current state
- RE: ACTION-93 (Full semantics): Short report about current state
General discussion for TC Wednesday
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday
raw minutes of imports tf meeting
Regrets for March 12 & 19 Telecons
Distinguishing fragments
ISSUE-100 (rdfall): Should there be valid OWL ontologies that can not be expressed in RDF
- Re: ISSUE-100 (rdfall): NO DISCUSSION YET
- Re: ISSUE-100 (rdfall): Should there be valid OWL ontologies that can not be expressed in RDF
Equating subproperties to restricted properties
ISSUE-99 (Test): Testing tracker
ISSUE-98 (spelling): symetric => symmetric [editorial]
Reminder: Imports task force meeting monday 10AM EST
[META] Raising a new issue as "raised" or "open"?
comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite
- Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite
- Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite
- Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite
- Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite
- RE: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite
Restructuring StrucSpec and Semantics
Re: A proposal for a way forward regarding fragments
[Fwd: Re: A proposal for a way forward regarding fragments]
OWL XML serialization
Relational database vs. RDF Incubator group launched
Agenda for TC 2008-03-05
A proposal for the fragments document
- Re: A proposal for the fragments document
- Re: A proposal for the fragments document
- RE: A proposal for the fragments document
A summary of the proposed resolution of ISSUE-95
ISSUE-97 (GRDDL): Add GRDDL to OWL/XML Syntax
Issue-3
ISSUE-93: A sub-Wiki for OWL-Full development
"feature at a time" semantics (ACTION-79)
"feature at a time" semantics (ACTION-86)
General discussion for Wednesday's teleconference
[OWL WG] Draft minutes from Wednesday, February 27th
- Re: [OWL WG] Draft minutes from Wednesday, February 27th
- Re: [OWL WG] Draft minutes from Wednesday, February 27th
- RE: [OWL WG] Draft minutes from Wednesday, February 27th