- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:38:30 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "'OWL Working Group WG'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Fine by whatever we decide. I noticed this in my inbox for a couple of days with no response, and didn't want to forget it, so put it up as an issue. I think it can be closed by Boris directly, being an editorial issue and we don't need to process it by the group at all at this point. -Alan On Mar 7, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > Process question: while we need to have formal process for dealing > with public comment (particularly after last call), this seems a > little heavyweight at this stage. > > I would have a slight preference for editorial corrections made in > response to public comment to simply be done, and reported in one > of the routine business items. > > OTOH if people are happy to actually use the tracker for these - so > be it. > > Jeremy > > Ian Horrocks wrote: >> Thanks! >> Ian >> On 7 Mar 2008, at 10:24, Boris Motik wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I've just fixed the spelling, so we can close this issue before >>> we even formally open it :-) >>> >>> Boris >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg- >>>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of OWL Working >>>> Group Issue Tracker >>>> Sent: 07 March 2008 07:54 >>>> To: public-owl-wg@w3.org >>>> Subject: ISSUE-98 (spelling): symetric => symmetric [editorial] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ISSUE-98 (spelling): symetric => symmetric [editorial] >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/ >>>> >>>> Raised by: Alan Ruttenberg >>>> On product: >>>> >>>>> From http://www.w3.org/mid/28F10144-F63A-42A3-A560- >>>>> BB1712A3F49D@bbn.com >>>> >>>> Resent-From: public-owl-comments@w3.org >>>> From: mdean@bbn.com >>>> Subject: symetric => symmetric >>>> Date: March 5, 2008 10:19:47 PM EST >>>> To: public-owl-comments@w3.org >>>> Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/28F10144-F63A-42A3- >>>> A560-BB1712A3F49D@bbn.com> >>>> Security: ?Signed >>>> >>>> In [1], the productions symetricObjectProperty and >>>> asymetricObjectProperty should presumably be >>>> symmetricObjectProperty and asymmetricObjectProperty throughout >>>> (spelling and consistency >>>> correction). >>>> >>>> Mike >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-owl11-syntax-20080108/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> > >
Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 18:43:21 UTC